The high-bar and low-bar back-squats: a biomechanical analysis

Daniel J. Glassbrook, Scott R. Brown, Eric R. Helms, Scott Duncan, Adam G. Storey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

No previous study has compared the joint angle and ground reaction force (vertical force [Fv]) differences between the high-bar back-squat (HBBS) and low-bar back-squat (LBBS) above 90% 1 repetition maximum (1RM). Six male powerlifters (POW) (height: 179.2 ± 7.8 cm; mass: 87.1 ± 8.0 kg; age: 21-33 years) of international level, 6 male Olympic weightlifters (OLY) (height: 176.7 ± 7.7 cm; mass: 83.1 ± 13 kg; age: 22-30 years) of national level, and 6 recreationally trained male athletes (height: 181.9 ± 8.7 cm; mass: 87.9 ± 15.3 kg; age: 23-33 years) performed the LBBS, HBBS, and both LBBS and HBBS (respectively) up to and including 100% 1RM. Small to moderate (d = 0.2-0.5) effect size differences were observed between the POW and OLY in joint angles and Fv, although none were statistically significant. However, significant joint angle results were observed between the experienced POW/OLY and the recreationally trained group. Our findings suggest that practitioners seeking to place emphasis on the stronger hip musculature should consider the LBBS. Also, when the goal is to lift the greatest load possible, the LBBS may be preferable. Conversely, the HBBS is more suited to replicate movements that exhibit a more upright torso position, such as the snatch and clean, or to place more emphasis on the associated musculature of the knee joint.

LanguageEnglish
PagesS1-S18
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Volume33
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Joints
Torso
Knee Joint
Athletes
Hip

Keywords

  • joint angles
  • ground reaction forces
  • powerlifting
  • Olympic weightlifting

Cite this

Glassbrook, Daniel J. ; Brown, Scott R. ; Helms, Eric R. ; Duncan, Scott ; Storey, Adam G. / The high-bar and low-bar back-squats : a biomechanical analysis. In: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2019 ; Vol. 33. pp. S1-S18.
@article{2dbe44b0e22846a4ac6fbb977178ea79,
title = "The high-bar and low-bar back-squats: a biomechanical analysis",
abstract = "No previous study has compared the joint angle and ground reaction force (vertical force [Fv]) differences between the high-bar back-squat (HBBS) and low-bar back-squat (LBBS) above 90{\%} 1 repetition maximum (1RM). Six male powerlifters (POW) (height: 179.2 ± 7.8 cm; mass: 87.1 ± 8.0 kg; age: 21-33 years) of international level, 6 male Olympic weightlifters (OLY) (height: 176.7 ± 7.7 cm; mass: 83.1 ± 13 kg; age: 22-30 years) of national level, and 6 recreationally trained male athletes (height: 181.9 ± 8.7 cm; mass: 87.9 ± 15.3 kg; age: 23-33 years) performed the LBBS, HBBS, and both LBBS and HBBS (respectively) up to and including 100{\%} 1RM. Small to moderate (d = 0.2-0.5) effect size differences were observed between the POW and OLY in joint angles and Fv, although none were statistically significant. However, significant joint angle results were observed between the experienced POW/OLY and the recreationally trained group. Our findings suggest that practitioners seeking to place emphasis on the stronger hip musculature should consider the LBBS. Also, when the goal is to lift the greatest load possible, the LBBS may be preferable. Conversely, the HBBS is more suited to replicate movements that exhibit a more upright torso position, such as the snatch and clean, or to place more emphasis on the associated musculature of the knee joint.",
keywords = "joint angles, ground reaction forces, powerlifting, Olympic weightlifting",
author = "Glassbrook, {Daniel J.} and Brown, {Scott R.} and Helms, {Eric R.} and Scott Duncan and Storey, {Adam G.}",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1519/JSC.0000000000001836",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "S1--S18",
journal = "Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research",
issn = "1064-8011",
publisher = "NSCA National Strength and Conditioning Association",

}

The high-bar and low-bar back-squats : a biomechanical analysis. / Glassbrook, Daniel J.; Brown, Scott R.; Helms, Eric R.; Duncan, Scott; Storey, Adam G.

In: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, Vol. 33, 01.07.2019, p. S1-S18.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The high-bar and low-bar back-squats

T2 - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

AU - Glassbrook, Daniel J.

AU - Brown, Scott R.

AU - Helms, Eric R.

AU - Duncan, Scott

AU - Storey, Adam G.

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - No previous study has compared the joint angle and ground reaction force (vertical force [Fv]) differences between the high-bar back-squat (HBBS) and low-bar back-squat (LBBS) above 90% 1 repetition maximum (1RM). Six male powerlifters (POW) (height: 179.2 ± 7.8 cm; mass: 87.1 ± 8.0 kg; age: 21-33 years) of international level, 6 male Olympic weightlifters (OLY) (height: 176.7 ± 7.7 cm; mass: 83.1 ± 13 kg; age: 22-30 years) of national level, and 6 recreationally trained male athletes (height: 181.9 ± 8.7 cm; mass: 87.9 ± 15.3 kg; age: 23-33 years) performed the LBBS, HBBS, and both LBBS and HBBS (respectively) up to and including 100% 1RM. Small to moderate (d = 0.2-0.5) effect size differences were observed between the POW and OLY in joint angles and Fv, although none were statistically significant. However, significant joint angle results were observed between the experienced POW/OLY and the recreationally trained group. Our findings suggest that practitioners seeking to place emphasis on the stronger hip musculature should consider the LBBS. Also, when the goal is to lift the greatest load possible, the LBBS may be preferable. Conversely, the HBBS is more suited to replicate movements that exhibit a more upright torso position, such as the snatch and clean, or to place more emphasis on the associated musculature of the knee joint.

AB - No previous study has compared the joint angle and ground reaction force (vertical force [Fv]) differences between the high-bar back-squat (HBBS) and low-bar back-squat (LBBS) above 90% 1 repetition maximum (1RM). Six male powerlifters (POW) (height: 179.2 ± 7.8 cm; mass: 87.1 ± 8.0 kg; age: 21-33 years) of international level, 6 male Olympic weightlifters (OLY) (height: 176.7 ± 7.7 cm; mass: 83.1 ± 13 kg; age: 22-30 years) of national level, and 6 recreationally trained male athletes (height: 181.9 ± 8.7 cm; mass: 87.9 ± 15.3 kg; age: 23-33 years) performed the LBBS, HBBS, and both LBBS and HBBS (respectively) up to and including 100% 1RM. Small to moderate (d = 0.2-0.5) effect size differences were observed between the POW and OLY in joint angles and Fv, although none were statistically significant. However, significant joint angle results were observed between the experienced POW/OLY and the recreationally trained group. Our findings suggest that practitioners seeking to place emphasis on the stronger hip musculature should consider the LBBS. Also, when the goal is to lift the greatest load possible, the LBBS may be preferable. Conversely, the HBBS is more suited to replicate movements that exhibit a more upright torso position, such as the snatch and clean, or to place more emphasis on the associated musculature of the knee joint.

KW - joint angles

KW - ground reaction forces

KW - powerlifting

KW - Olympic weightlifting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062282080&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001836

DO - 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001836

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - S1-S18

JO - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

JF - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

SN - 1064-8011

ER -