The hows and whys of "we" (and "I") in groups

Amanda J. Barnier; Celia B. Harris; John Sutton

doi:10.1017/S0140525X15001260

The hows and whys of "we" (and "I") in groups

Amanda J. Barnier^*, Celia B. Harris, John Sutton

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/opinion › peer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Informed by our interdisciplinary research program on collaborative recall, we argue that Baumeister et al. should consider: (1) group success as a balance between differentiation and integration (not differentiation alone); (2) variation in constellations of people and processes within and across groups; and (3) nuanced measurement of what people bring to, do in, and get out of groups.

Original language	English
Article number	e138
Pages (from-to)	14-15
Number of pages	2
Journal	Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume	39
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15001260
Publication status	Published - 2016

Access to Document

10.1017/S0140525X15001260

Cite this

@article{8f8ae283a6254d4da019c20177f4ac94,

title = "The hows and whys of {"}we{"} (and {"}I{"}) in groups",

abstract = "Informed by our interdisciplinary research program on collaborative recall, we argue that Baumeister et al. should consider: (1) group success as a balance between differentiation and integration (not differentiation alone); (2) variation in constellations of people and processes within and across groups; and (3) nuanced measurement of what people bring to, do in, and get out of groups.",

author = "Barnier, {Amanda J.} and Harris, {Celia B.} and John Sutton",

year = "2016",

doi = "10.1017/S0140525X15001260",

language = "English",

volume = "39",

pages = "14--15",

journal = "Behavioral and Brain Sciences",

issn = "0140-525X",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press (CUP)",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The hows and whys of "we" (and "I") in groups

AU - Barnier, Amanda J.

AU - Harris, Celia B.

AU - Sutton, John

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Informed by our interdisciplinary research program on collaborative recall, we argue that Baumeister et al. should consider: (1) group success as a balance between differentiation and integration (not differentiation alone); (2) variation in constellations of people and processes within and across groups; and (3) nuanced measurement of what people bring to, do in, and get out of groups.

AB - Informed by our interdisciplinary research program on collaborative recall, we argue that Baumeister et al. should consider: (1) group success as a balance between differentiation and integration (not differentiation alone); (2) variation in constellations of people and processes within and across groups; and (3) nuanced measurement of what people bring to, do in, and get out of groups.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040369345&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0140525X15001260

DO - 10.1017/S0140525X15001260

M3 - Comment/opinion

C2 - 28355775

SN - 0140-525X

VL - 39

SP - 14

EP - 15

JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

M1 - e138

ER -

The hows and whys of "we" (and "I") in groups

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this