Abstract
We investigate the impact of firm-level political risks on carbon emissions. Our results show that companies decrease their total emission footprint in response to higher political risks. However, this is driven predominantly by the reduction of scope 2 emissions, which “involves purchased energy consumed by the firm.” With increasing policymakers, investors, and stakeholders' emphasis on positive climate change actions, our findings indicate that corporations may view reducing carbon emissions as an efficient strategy to draw attention away from higher political risks. Further analyses reveal that this tactic is adopted mainly by resource-constrained companies that are smaller, underperforming, with lower cash reserves and cashflow from operations. Using a channel test, we also provide empirical evidence that reducing scope 2 emissions in response to higher political risks may have helped firms avoid lower market valuation. Our findings are robust to a series of sensitivity and endogeneity checks. Overall, this study advances the literature by highlighting the interplay between politics and carbon emission in an increasingly climate change-focused environment.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 108130 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-15 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Energy Economics |
Volume | 141 |
Early online date | 11 Dec 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2025 |
Bibliographical note
© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.Keywords
- Carbon emissions
- Climate change
- Market value
- Political risks
- Resource constraints