The Impact of public funding on creative processes in Australia: three case studies of visual artists

Emily Gilfillan, Guy Morrow

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Artistic practices are subjected to numerous situational factors that simultaneously hinder and/or enable future artistic activity: public funding is positioned in this research as one such situational factor. This article explores the immediate impacts public funding has on the artistically creative processes of the funded art project using three case studies of Australian-based visual artists Kelly Doley, Agatha Gothe-Snape and Nigel Helyer. Each of these artists has recently received new work grants from the Australia Council for the Arts. Notions relating to definitions of creativity are explored. We conclude that while public funding can impact on the creative process of the funded projects, the (in)ability to access funding does not necessarily impact on the motivations to continue practicing art.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)28-40
    Number of pages13
    JournalThe Asia Pacific journal of arts and cultural management
    Volume11
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Keywords

    • Artistic careers
    • Artistic creativity
    • Creative processes
    • Public funding
    • Visual arts

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Impact of public funding on creative processes in Australia: three case studies of visual artists'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this