The importance of censoring in competing risks analysis of the subdistribution hazard

Mark W. Donoghoe*, Val Gebski

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)
40 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: The analysis of time-to-event data can be complicated by competing risks, which are events that alter the probability of, or completely preclude the occurrence of an event of interest. This is distinct from censoring, which merely prevents us from observing the time at which the event of interest occurs. However, the censoring distribution plays a vital role in the proportional subdistribution hazards model, a commonly used method for regression analysis of time-to-event data in the presence of competing risks. Methods: We present the equations that underlie the proportional subdistribution hazards model to highlight the way in which the censoring distribution is included in its estimation via risk set weights. By simulating competing risk data under a proportional subdistribution hazards model with different patterns of censoring, we examine the properties of the estimates from such a model when the censoring distribution is misspecified. We use an example from stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma to illustrate the issue in real data. Results: Models that correctly specified the censoring distribution performed better than those that did not, giving lower bias and variance in the estimate of the subdistribution hazard ratio. In particular, when the covariate of interest does not affect the censoring distribution but is used in calculating risk set weights, estimates from the model based on these weights may not reflect the correct likelihood structure and therefore may have suboptimal performance. Conclusions: The estimation of the censoring distribution can affect the accuracy and conclusions of a competing risks analysis, so it is important that this issue is considered carefully when analysing time-to-event data in the presence of competing risks.

Original languageEnglish
Article number52
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalBMC Medical Research Methodology
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Apr 2017
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2017. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • censoring
  • competing risks
  • proportional subdistribution hazards model

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The importance of censoring in competing risks analysis of the subdistribution hazard'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this