The (im)possibilities of doing tourism otherwise: the case of settler colonial Australia and the closure of the climb at Uluru

Phoebe Everingham*, Andrew Peters, Freya Higgins-Desbiolles

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article analyses the recent closure of the Uluru climb in the settler colonial context of Australia and reflects on (im)possibilities for doing tourism otherwise to practices and logics of coloniality. Tourism at Uluru is embedded within settler colonial map-making, privileging supply side models of consumption at the expense of the Anangu Traditional Custodians. We contribute to the emerging body of research in tourism that argues for a dismantling of colonial logics in practice and theory and discuss the possibilities inherent in forms of tourism led by the Aboriginal custodians. In this context, tourism can promote deeper engagement to place that is ‘more-than-human’, beyond the Eurocentric dualisms of nature and culture, human/non-human/spirit. Unlearning coloniality is key for promoting transformative tourism.

Original languageEnglish
Article number103178
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalAnnals of Tourism Research
Volume88
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Australia
  • Critical tourism studies
  • Decolonisation
  • Indigenous peoples
  • Uluru
  • Settler colonialism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The (im)possibilities of doing tourism otherwise: the case of settler colonial Australia and the closure of the climb at Uluru'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this