The Influence of inertia on brand switching behaviour

David Gray, Steven D'Alessandro, Leanne Carter

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)


Understanding the process of switching providers is a topic of much debate and interest amongst market scholars and managers. What has not been studied in-depth until now, is the influence of inertia on customer advocacy, customer satisfaction and switching intentions. Results based on qualitative and quantitative research of 799 mobile phone service customers showed that customer inertial factors such as confusion; competitor attraction (i.e. the lack of perceived differentiation amongst alternative service providers); habit or passivity in continuing with the same product/service supplier; switching costs; customer ambivalence and time constraints can negatively impact customer advocacy, customer satisfaction and switching intentions. The implications for research and management are that customer inertia is a complex variable best uncovered in qualitative research. If used unwisely it has the capacity to allow a brand to temporarily get away with poor service in situations where their clients perceive that there are high costs of changing to an alternative supplier. The longer term costs however are diminished customer advocacy and customer satisfaction.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLooking forward, looking back
Subtitle of host publicationdrawing on the past to shape the future of marketing : proceedings of the 2013 World Marketing Congress
EditorsColin Campbell, Junzhao Jonathon Ma
Place of PublicationCham
PublisherSpringer, Springer Nature
Number of pages9
ISBN (Print)9783319241845
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Publication series

NameDevelopments in marketing science : proceedings of the Academic of Marketing Science


  • customer inertia
  • brand switching
  • switching costs


Dive into the research topics of 'The Influence of inertia on brand switching behaviour'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this