The interface of clinical decision-making with study protocols for knowledge translation from a walking recovery trial

Julie A. Hershberg*, Dorian K. Rose, Julie K. Tilson, Bettina Brutsch, Anita Correa, Joann Gallichio, Molly McLeod, Craig Moore, Sam Wu, Pamela W. Duncan, Andrea L. Behrman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Despite efforts to translate knowledge into clinical practice, barriers often arise in adapting the strict protocols of a randomized, controlled trial (RCT) to the individual patient. The Locomotor Experience Applied Post-Stroke (LEAPS) RCT demonstrated equal effectiveness of 2 intervention protocols for walking recovery poststroke; both protocols were more effective than usual care physical therapy. The purpose of this article was to provide knowledge-translation tools to facilitate implementation of the LEAPS RCT protocols into clinical practice. Methods: Participants from 2 of the trial's intervention arms: (1) early Locomotor Training Program (LTP) and (2) Home Exercise Program (HEP) were chosen for case presentation. The two cases illustrate how the protocols are used in synergy with individual patient presentations and clinical expertise. Decision algorithms and guidelines for progression represent the interface between implementation of an RCT standardized intervention protocol and clinical decision-making. Outcomes: In each case, the participant presents with a distinct clinical challenge that the therapist addresses by integrating the participant's unique presentation with the therapist's expertise while maintaining fidelity to the LEAPS protocol. Both participants progressed through an increasingly challenging intervention despite their own unique presentation. Summary: Decision algorithms and exercise progression for the LTP and HEP protocols facilitate translation of the RCT protocol to the real world of clinical practice. The two case examples to facilitate translation of the LEAPS RCT into clinical practice by enhancing understanding of the protocols, their progression, and their application to individual participants.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)59-67
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Neurologic Physical Therapy
Volume41
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • locomotor training
  • stroke
  • knowledge translation
  • clinical decision-making

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The interface of clinical decision-making with study protocols for knowledge translation from a walking recovery trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this