This paper presents an experimental study on the interpretation of plural pronoun they in discourse, and offers an answer to two questions. The first question is whether the anaphoric interpretation of they corresponds to that of its antecedent NP(maximal interpretation), or by the “whole” previous sentence (reference interpretation). The second question is whether speakers may access only one interpretation or both, although at different “moments” in discourse. The answers to these questions suggest that an accurate logical and psychological model of anaphora resolution includes two principles. A first principle finds a “default” interpretation, a second principle determines when the “alternative” interpretation can (and must) be accessed.
|Number of pages||8|
|Journal||Proceedings of the Australasian Language Technology Association Workshop 2011|
|Publication status||Published - 2011|
|Event||Australasian Language Technology Workshop (9th : 2011) - Canberra|
Duration: 1 Dec 2011 → 2 Dec 2011