The Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd v Smith priority paradox: just how paramount are paramount interests?

Lisa Spagnolo, Sharon Rodrick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

109 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to explain and critique how courts have interpreted the paramount interest provisions in Torrens system legislation. The discussion pivots around Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd v Smith (‘Perpetual’), which concerned ‘the interest of a tenant in possession’ in the Transfer of Land Act 1958 (Vic) section 42(2)(e), an exception to indefeasibility recognised in all Australian jurisdictions to varying extents. We analyse the two High Court cases upon which the Court in Perpetual relied and critically compare the ‘two step manner’ in which the Court analysed priority under section 42(2)(e) with the ‘one step manner’ in which priority is dealt with in other exceptions to indefeasibility. Proceeding on the assumption that the interpretation of section 42(2)(e) adopted in Perpetual is correct, we consider whether the judges characterised the parties’ interests correctly and whether Perpetual’s approach to section 42(2)(e) could, and should, be taken to other paramount interests.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)839-872
Number of pages34
JournalUniversity of New South Wales Law Journal
Volume45
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2022

Bibliographical note

Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • Torrens System
  • Torrens title
  • indefeasibility
  • Paramount interests
  • Leases
  • leasehold interests
  • tenancy
  • adverse possession
  • crown reservations
  • priority disputes
  • easements
  • rates and taxes
  • property law, Australia
  • property law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd v Smith priority paradox: just how paramount are paramount interests?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this