Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Kids FACE FEARS pragmatic randomized trial of therapist-led vs guided internet cognitive-behavioral therapy for pediatric anxiety: rationale and methods

Jonathan S. Comer*, Donna B. Pincus, Molly C. Adrian, Gary McCreary, Leslie Miller, Tomas Munarriz, Kathleen Myers, Karen Xiomara Pierre-Louis, Rheanna Platt, Melissa K. Ripley, Andrea E. Spencer, Haniya Saleem Syeda, Margarita Alegría, Amelia Brandt, Carolina Costa, Lindsay Cooper, Stefany Coxe, Annie W. Dantowitz, Anthony Steven Dick, Alyssa M. FarleyJami M. Furr, Alex E. Keller, Julia A. Lejeune, Lauren F. McLellan, Dana L. McMakin, Rachel A. Merson, Ricardo F. Muñoz, Ronald M. Rapee, Kendra L. Read, Sara Rivero-Conil, Bridget Poznanski, Michelin Jane Janvier, Hanan N. Salem, Philip Shumway, Jennifer Sikov, Michelle V. Porche, Lisa R. Fortuna

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: Pediatric anxiety constitutes a serious public health concern. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is a gold standard treatment, preferred by families over pharmacological options, but barriers limit CBT accessibility. Modern CBT formats include varying levels of therapist involvement and differential technologies to overcome barriers, but little is known about their effectiveness in typical care settings, as well as in pediatric care. The Kids Formats of Anxiety Care Effectiveness study For Extending the Acceptability and Reach of Services (Kids FACE FEARS) trial addresses these gaps. Method: The Kids FACE FEARS trial was a multisite, pragmatic randomized trial comparing therapist-led CBT (telehealth, office-based, or hybrid) with guided internet-based CBT (self-administered/self-paced, with minimal therapist support) for treating anxiety in youth (7-18 years old) identified in pediatric care. English- and Spanish-speaking families were enrolled from high-volume, urban pediatric health care sites affiliated with major medical centers in 4 metropolitan regions. This article describes the study's rationale, treatment conditions, participant recruitment, assessment schedule/strategy, and provider training/consultation. Conclusions: Recent innovations have expanded CBT delivery options for pediatric anxiety. This is the first multisite randomized trial directly comparing CBT formats that draw on differential levels of therapist involvement and modes of technology. Sampling and study design features poise the Kids FACE FEARS trial to be one of the largest and most diverse/representative controlled trials of CBT for pediatric anxiety. In the context of evolving CBT delivery options, trial findings can inform patient-centered decision making and help tailor treatment selections for underserved youth with anxiety. Clinical trial registration information: Kids FACE FEARS Comparative Effectiveness Research; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03707158

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)373-398
Number of pages26
JournalJAACAP Open
Volume4
Issue number2
Early online date24 Dec 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2026

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2025. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • anxiety
  • cognitive-behavioral therapy
  • guided iCBT
  • iCBT
  • telehealth

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Kids FACE FEARS pragmatic randomized trial of therapist-led vs guided internet cognitive-behavioral therapy for pediatric anxiety: rationale and methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this