The Limits of Low-Tax Social Democracy? Welfare, Tax and Fiscal Dilemmas for Labor in Government

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The Australian Labor Party, following its election to government in 2007, has implemented an ambitious social policy agenda with spending on hospitals, pensions and community workers, as well as programs for parental leave and disability. It has also reformed taxes, in part to finance these reforms, implementing the mining and carbon taxes in 2012. Labor, however, has difficulty avoiding deficits because tax revenues are too low to finance expanded welfare. This article explores the political constraints and opportunities involved in financing welfare by examining voter responses to the ANU Poll of September 2011. Spending on welfare is supported by low-income earners, while taxing big industries finds greater support among university-educated voters. The article advances an explanation for this mismatch and for why tax resistance has hindered Labor's efforts to finance welfare expansion.

LanguageEnglish
Pages286-306
Number of pages21
JournalAustralian Journal of Political Science
Volume48
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2013

Fingerprint

social democracy
taxes
welfare
labor
finance
parental leave
Labour Party
tax revenue
pension
mismatch
voter
deficit
low income
election
disability
worker
reform
industry
university
community

Cite this

@article{db98123814e94730afc56f3e3ca5418c,
title = "The Limits of Low-Tax Social Democracy? Welfare, Tax and Fiscal Dilemmas for Labor in Government",
abstract = "The Australian Labor Party, following its election to government in 2007, has implemented an ambitious social policy agenda with spending on hospitals, pensions and community workers, as well as programs for parental leave and disability. It has also reformed taxes, in part to finance these reforms, implementing the mining and carbon taxes in 2012. Labor, however, has difficulty avoiding deficits because tax revenues are too low to finance expanded welfare. This article explores the political constraints and opportunities involved in financing welfare by examining voter responses to the ANU Poll of September 2011. Spending on welfare is supported by low-income earners, while taxing big industries finds greater support among university-educated voters. The article advances an explanation for this mismatch and for why tax resistance has hindered Labor's efforts to finance welfare expansion.",
author = "Shaun Wilson",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1080/10361146.2013.821102",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "286--306",
journal = "Australian Journal of Political Science",
issn = "1036-1146",
publisher = "Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group",
number = "3",

}

The Limits of Low-Tax Social Democracy? Welfare, Tax and Fiscal Dilemmas for Labor in Government. / Wilson, Shaun.

In: Australian Journal of Political Science, Vol. 48, No. 3, 09.2013, p. 286-306.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Limits of Low-Tax Social Democracy? Welfare, Tax and Fiscal Dilemmas for Labor in Government

AU - Wilson, Shaun

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - The Australian Labor Party, following its election to government in 2007, has implemented an ambitious social policy agenda with spending on hospitals, pensions and community workers, as well as programs for parental leave and disability. It has also reformed taxes, in part to finance these reforms, implementing the mining and carbon taxes in 2012. Labor, however, has difficulty avoiding deficits because tax revenues are too low to finance expanded welfare. This article explores the political constraints and opportunities involved in financing welfare by examining voter responses to the ANU Poll of September 2011. Spending on welfare is supported by low-income earners, while taxing big industries finds greater support among university-educated voters. The article advances an explanation for this mismatch and for why tax resistance has hindered Labor's efforts to finance welfare expansion.

AB - The Australian Labor Party, following its election to government in 2007, has implemented an ambitious social policy agenda with spending on hospitals, pensions and community workers, as well as programs for parental leave and disability. It has also reformed taxes, in part to finance these reforms, implementing the mining and carbon taxes in 2012. Labor, however, has difficulty avoiding deficits because tax revenues are too low to finance expanded welfare. This article explores the political constraints and opportunities involved in financing welfare by examining voter responses to the ANU Poll of September 2011. Spending on welfare is supported by low-income earners, while taxing big industries finds greater support among university-educated voters. The article advances an explanation for this mismatch and for why tax resistance has hindered Labor's efforts to finance welfare expansion.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84886896680&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10361146.2013.821102

DO - 10.1080/10361146.2013.821102

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 286

EP - 306

JO - Australian Journal of Political Science

T2 - Australian Journal of Political Science

JF - Australian Journal of Political Science

SN - 1036-1146

IS - 3

ER -