The limits of multiculturalism in Australia? the Shari'a flogging case of R v. Raad, Fayed, Cifci and Coskun

Selda Dagistanli*, Adam Possamai, Bryan S. Turner, Malcolm Voyce, Joshua Roose

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article focuses on the marginal extremities - the limits - of Shari’a practices in Australia, through the example of a criminal case in which four Sydney-based Muslim men whipped a Muslim convert to punish him for his excessive consumption of drugs and alcohol. The men claimed they acted in line with the doctrines of Shari’a practice to ‘purify’ or absolve the victim of his sins. While the case was tried before a magistrate in a lower court, it is argued in this article that its social and political significance was wider, reaching into contemporary debates around multiculturalism and immigration from non-western, non-liberal and mainly Muslim nations. Mainstream media and political narratives viewed the whipping as an example of the moral dangers of accommodating Shari’a norms, eliding the differences between peaceable Shari’a and its violent extremities, while situating the case at the limits of multicultural accommodation. This article interrogates the objectionable margins of some cultural practices through this limit case. At the same time it questions the limits or limitations of a multiculturalism that homogeneously views the practices of entire ethnic or religious groups as violent and incommensurable with dominant norms, while using these understandings as a justification for marginalising these groups.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1258-1275
Number of pages18
JournalSociological Review
Volume66
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2018

Keywords

  • Limits
  • Multiculturalism
  • Muslims
  • Racism
  • Shari’a

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The limits of multiculturalism in Australia? the Shari'a flogging case of R v. Raad, Fayed, Cifci and Coskun'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this