Abstract
Faced with extreme demands, hypothetical thinking runs the danger of total failure. Paradoxical propositions such as the LIAR (‘I am lying’) provide an opportunity to test it to its limits. Embedded in conditionals, they tended to occasion a breakdown of probabilistic inference (0% True-0% False pattern) demonstrating the vulnerability of hypothetical thinking when taxed by embedded suppositional processes. In contrast, items with the TRUTHTELLER (‘I am telling the truth’) were ‘collapsed’ to responses of conditional probability closely resembling estimates of control items.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society |
Editors | Bruno G. Bara, Lawrence Barsalou, Monica Bucciarelli |
Place of Publication | Mahwah, NJ |
Publisher | Lawrence Erlbaum |
Pages | 630-635 |
Number of pages | 6 |
ISBN (Print) | 0976831813 |
Publication status | Published - 2005 |
Externally published | Yes |
Event | Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (27th : 2005) - Stresa, Italy Duration: 21 Jul 2005 → 23 Jul 2005 |
Conference
Conference | Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (27th : 2005) |
---|---|
City | Stresa, Italy |
Period | 21/07/05 → 23/07/05 |
Keywords
- reasoning
- conditionals
- liar paradox