The marketization of care: global challenges and national responses in Australia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Care is a social necessity for life. Ensuring access to appropriate care at crucial points in the life course became a political necessity soon after the mid-20th century, as the right to suitable care became recognized as a fundamental entitlement of citizenship in most advanced capitalist economies. Over recent decades there has been a shift away from more traditional welfare state forms of public services towards increasingly marketized systems of provision. Changes in the provision of care in the public domain are associated with an increasing reliance on private capital and competition between a variety of providers, with public agencies competing alongside private for-profit and not-for-profit agencies. Drawing on care theory, historical sociology and political economic analysis, this article examines the conflicting tensions that shape aged care under marketization. Using Australia as a case study, it is argued that as private capital and resources take the place of scarce public resources and enable expenditure cuts to be presented as innovation, better services and more ‘consumer choice’, it is not the market but the finance, regulation and management work of the state that is the essential determinant of the assistance previously provided through non-market processes.

LanguageEnglish
Pages503-516
Number of pages14
JournalCurrent Sociology
Volume66
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2018

Fingerprint

profit
resources
welfare state
public service
finance
expenditures
sociology
citizenship
assistance
determinants
innovation
regulation
economy
market
management
economics

Keywords

  • aged care
  • Australia
  • care
  • case study
  • marketization
  • sociology

Cite this

@article{1ead87de8cbd4be9b0bd98b6a7e5397c,
title = "The marketization of care: global challenges and national responses in Australia",
abstract = "Care is a social necessity for life. Ensuring access to appropriate care at crucial points in the life course became a political necessity soon after the mid-20th century, as the right to suitable care became recognized as a fundamental entitlement of citizenship in most advanced capitalist economies. Over recent decades there has been a shift away from more traditional welfare state forms of public services towards increasingly marketized systems of provision. Changes in the provision of care in the public domain are associated with an increasing reliance on private capital and competition between a variety of providers, with public agencies competing alongside private for-profit and not-for-profit agencies. Drawing on care theory, historical sociology and political economic analysis, this article examines the conflicting tensions that shape aged care under marketization. Using Australia as a case study, it is argued that as private capital and resources take the place of scarce public resources and enable expenditure cuts to be presented as innovation, better services and more ‘consumer choice’, it is not the market but the finance, regulation and management work of the state that is the essential determinant of the assistance previously provided through non-market processes.",
keywords = "aged care, Australia, care, case study, marketization, sociology",
author = "Michael Fine and Bob Davidson",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0011392118765281",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
pages = "503--516",
journal = "Current Sociology",
issn = "0011-3921",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "4",

}

The marketization of care : global challenges and national responses in Australia. / Fine, Michael; Davidson, Bob.

In: Current Sociology, Vol. 66, No. 4, 01.07.2018, p. 503-516.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The marketization of care

T2 - Current Sociology

AU - Fine,Michael

AU - Davidson,Bob

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - Care is a social necessity for life. Ensuring access to appropriate care at crucial points in the life course became a political necessity soon after the mid-20th century, as the right to suitable care became recognized as a fundamental entitlement of citizenship in most advanced capitalist economies. Over recent decades there has been a shift away from more traditional welfare state forms of public services towards increasingly marketized systems of provision. Changes in the provision of care in the public domain are associated with an increasing reliance on private capital and competition between a variety of providers, with public agencies competing alongside private for-profit and not-for-profit agencies. Drawing on care theory, historical sociology and political economic analysis, this article examines the conflicting tensions that shape aged care under marketization. Using Australia as a case study, it is argued that as private capital and resources take the place of scarce public resources and enable expenditure cuts to be presented as innovation, better services and more ‘consumer choice’, it is not the market but the finance, regulation and management work of the state that is the essential determinant of the assistance previously provided through non-market processes.

AB - Care is a social necessity for life. Ensuring access to appropriate care at crucial points in the life course became a political necessity soon after the mid-20th century, as the right to suitable care became recognized as a fundamental entitlement of citizenship in most advanced capitalist economies. Over recent decades there has been a shift away from more traditional welfare state forms of public services towards increasingly marketized systems of provision. Changes in the provision of care in the public domain are associated with an increasing reliance on private capital and competition between a variety of providers, with public agencies competing alongside private for-profit and not-for-profit agencies. Drawing on care theory, historical sociology and political economic analysis, this article examines the conflicting tensions that shape aged care under marketization. Using Australia as a case study, it is argued that as private capital and resources take the place of scarce public resources and enable expenditure cuts to be presented as innovation, better services and more ‘consumer choice’, it is not the market but the finance, regulation and management work of the state that is the essential determinant of the assistance previously provided through non-market processes.

KW - aged care

KW - Australia

KW - care

KW - case study

KW - marketization

KW - sociology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048310153&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0011392118765281

DO - 10.1177/0011392118765281

M3 - Article

VL - 66

SP - 503

EP - 516

JO - Current Sociology

JF - Current Sociology

SN - 0011-3921

IS - 4

ER -