The mining industry's campaign against native title: Some explanations

Ashley Lavelle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The mining industry has consistently maintained that 'native title' is a major impediment to mineral exploration and development and that it is a key factor in recent industry trends. Yet there is little evidence to justify these claims. This article suggests that this contradiction is less a reflection of ideological opposition to native title on the part of industry leaders than a case of political posturing aimed at ensuring that government policy better reflects mining interests. Government policy is an investment determinant over which the industry can exert some influence, unlike other determinants such as commodity prices and exchange rates. In addition to the industry's self-interest in pressuring government to circumscribe native title rights by overstating its detrimental economic impact, the peculiar intensity of the campaign is explained by its concerns about its role in the policy process, its popularity in the community and its comparative power as an interest group.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)101-122
Number of pages22
JournalAustralian Journal of Political Science
Volume36
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The mining industry's campaign against native title: Some explanations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this