The myth of zero-sum responsibility: towards scaffolded responsibility for health

Neil Levy, Julian Savulescu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Some people argue that the distribution of medical resources should be sensitive to agents' responsibility for their ill-health. In contrast, others point to the social determinants of health to argue that the collective agents that control the conditions in which agents act should bear responsibility. To a large degree, this is a debate in which those who hold individuals responsible currently have the upper hand: warranted appeals to individual responsibility effectively block allocation of any significant degree of responsibility to collective agents. We suggest that a different understanding of individual responsibility might lead to a fairer allocation of blame. Scaffolded agency is individual agency exercised in a context in which opportunities and affordances are structured by others. Appeals to scaffolded agency at once recognize the role of the individual and of the collective agents who have put the scaffolds in place.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)85-105
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Moral Philosophy
Volume21
Issue number1-2
Early online date7 Sept 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2024
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2023. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • blame
  • group agents
  • public health
  • responsibility

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The myth of zero-sum responsibility: towards scaffolded responsibility for health'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this