TY - JOUR
T1 - The negative compatibility effect with relevant masks
T2 - A case for automatic motor inhibition
AU - Ocampo, Brenda
AU - Finkbeiner, Matthew
N1 - Copyright the Author/s. This Document is protected by copyright and was first published by Frontiers. All rights reserved. It is reproduced with permission.
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - For many years controversy has surrounded the so-called "negative compatibility effect" (NCE), a surprising phenomenon whereby responses to a target stimulus are delayed when the target is preceded by an unconscious, response-compatible prime. According to proponents of the "self-inhibition" hypothesis, the NCE occurs when a low-level self-inhibitory mechanism supresses early motor activations that are no longer supported by perceptual evidence. This account has been debated, however, by those who regard the NCE to be a stimulus-specific phenomenon that can be explained without recourse to a self-inhibitory mechanism. The present study used a novel reach-to-touch paradigm to test whether unconscious response priming would manifest as motor activation of the opposite-to-prime response (supporting mask-induced priming accounts), or motor inhibition of the primed response (supporting the notion of low-level self-inhibition). This paper presents new findings that show the emergence of positive and negative compatibility effects as they occur in stimulus processing time. In addition, evidence is provided suggesting that the NCE is not driven by the activation of the incorrect, "opposite-to-prime" response, but rather might reflect automatic motor inhibition.
AB - For many years controversy has surrounded the so-called "negative compatibility effect" (NCE), a surprising phenomenon whereby responses to a target stimulus are delayed when the target is preceded by an unconscious, response-compatible prime. According to proponents of the "self-inhibition" hypothesis, the NCE occurs when a low-level self-inhibitory mechanism supresses early motor activations that are no longer supported by perceptual evidence. This account has been debated, however, by those who regard the NCE to be a stimulus-specific phenomenon that can be explained without recourse to a self-inhibitory mechanism. The present study used a novel reach-to-touch paradigm to test whether unconscious response priming would manifest as motor activation of the opposite-to-prime response (supporting mask-induced priming accounts), or motor inhibition of the primed response (supporting the notion of low-level self-inhibition). This paper presents new findings that show the emergence of positive and negative compatibility effects as they occur in stimulus processing time. In addition, evidence is provided suggesting that the NCE is not driven by the activation of the incorrect, "opposite-to-prime" response, but rather might reflect automatic motor inhibition.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84889654957&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00822
DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00822
M3 - Article
C2 - 24265623
AN - SCOPUS:84889654957
SN - 1664-1078
VL - 4
SP - 1
EP - 9
JO - Frontiers in Psychology
JF - Frontiers in Psychology
M1 - 822
ER -