The neuronal recycling hypothesis for reading and the question of reading universals

Max Coltheart*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    7 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Are there universals of reading? There are three ways of construing this question. Is the region of the brain where reading is implemented identical regardless of what writing system the reader uses? Is the mental information-processing system used for reading the same regardless of what writing system the reader uses. Do the word's writing systems share certain universal features? Dehaene offers affirmative answers to all three questions in his book. Here I suggest instead that the answers should be negative. And I ask: if reading is not universal in any sense, what does this imply about Dehaene's Neuronal Recycling hypothesis for reading?.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)255-269
    Number of pages15
    JournalMind and Language
    Volume29
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2014

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The neuronal recycling hypothesis for reading and the question of reading universals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this