The performance of compliance in early childhood: neoliberalism and nice ladies

Margaret Sims, Manjula Waniganayake

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In this article, we propose to critique the way in which a hegemonic understanding of quality in early childhood settings is imposed upon practitioners, families and children through legislated quality assurance processes. The reality of neoliberalism is played out in the establishment and maintenance of the Australian early childhood quality assurance processes as they operate up to 2015, and the definition of approved qualifications for those working in early childhood. In both cases a tightly defined, top-down approach is used to assure quality. This has the effect of limiting flexibility and de-professionalising the work of early childhood professionals. It is our contention that in this neoliberal climate, early childhood practitioners have failed to construct their arguments in ways that could be better understood by outsiders to the profession; instead they are focusing on how best to be compliant. Challenging these hegemonic positions may even be perceived as being ‘anti-quality’ and not in the best interests of the early childhood sector. We analyse the current context in Australia (which reflects international trends) and explore possible strategies to re-empower the early childhood profession.
LanguageEnglish
Pages333-345
Number of pages13
JournalGlobal studies of childhood
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

neoliberalism
childhood
performance
quality assurance
profession
qualification
flexibility
climate
trend

Keywords

  • compliance
  • early childhood leadership
  • neoliberalism
  • resistance
  • power

Cite this

@article{b94f97fc17db4623bda9b24d5e238722,
title = "The performance of compliance in early childhood: neoliberalism and nice ladies",
abstract = "In this article, we propose to critique the way in which a hegemonic understanding of quality in early childhood settings is imposed upon practitioners, families and children through legislated quality assurance processes. The reality of neoliberalism is played out in the establishment and maintenance of the Australian early childhood quality assurance processes as they operate up to 2015, and the definition of approved qualifications for those working in early childhood. In both cases a tightly defined, top-down approach is used to assure quality. This has the effect of limiting flexibility and de-professionalising the work of early childhood professionals. It is our contention that in this neoliberal climate, early childhood practitioners have failed to construct their arguments in ways that could be better understood by outsiders to the profession; instead they are focusing on how best to be compliant. Challenging these hegemonic positions may even be perceived as being ‘anti-quality’ and not in the best interests of the early childhood sector. We analyse the current context in Australia (which reflects international trends) and explore possible strategies to re-empower the early childhood profession.",
keywords = "compliance, early childhood leadership, neoliberalism, resistance, power",
author = "Margaret Sims and Manjula Waniganayake",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1177/2043610615597154",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "333--345",
journal = "Global studies of childhood",
issn = "2043-6106",
publisher = "Symposium Journals",
number = "3",

}

The performance of compliance in early childhood : neoliberalism and nice ladies. / Sims, Margaret; Waniganayake, Manjula.

In: Global studies of childhood, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2015, p. 333-345.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The performance of compliance in early childhood

T2 - Global studies of childhood

AU - Sims, Margaret

AU - Waniganayake, Manjula

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - In this article, we propose to critique the way in which a hegemonic understanding of quality in early childhood settings is imposed upon practitioners, families and children through legislated quality assurance processes. The reality of neoliberalism is played out in the establishment and maintenance of the Australian early childhood quality assurance processes as they operate up to 2015, and the definition of approved qualifications for those working in early childhood. In both cases a tightly defined, top-down approach is used to assure quality. This has the effect of limiting flexibility and de-professionalising the work of early childhood professionals. It is our contention that in this neoliberal climate, early childhood practitioners have failed to construct their arguments in ways that could be better understood by outsiders to the profession; instead they are focusing on how best to be compliant. Challenging these hegemonic positions may even be perceived as being ‘anti-quality’ and not in the best interests of the early childhood sector. We analyse the current context in Australia (which reflects international trends) and explore possible strategies to re-empower the early childhood profession.

AB - In this article, we propose to critique the way in which a hegemonic understanding of quality in early childhood settings is imposed upon practitioners, families and children through legislated quality assurance processes. The reality of neoliberalism is played out in the establishment and maintenance of the Australian early childhood quality assurance processes as they operate up to 2015, and the definition of approved qualifications for those working in early childhood. In both cases a tightly defined, top-down approach is used to assure quality. This has the effect of limiting flexibility and de-professionalising the work of early childhood professionals. It is our contention that in this neoliberal climate, early childhood practitioners have failed to construct their arguments in ways that could be better understood by outsiders to the profession; instead they are focusing on how best to be compliant. Challenging these hegemonic positions may even be perceived as being ‘anti-quality’ and not in the best interests of the early childhood sector. We analyse the current context in Australia (which reflects international trends) and explore possible strategies to re-empower the early childhood profession.

KW - compliance

KW - early childhood leadership

KW - neoliberalism

KW - resistance

KW - power

U2 - 10.1177/2043610615597154

DO - 10.1177/2043610615597154

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 333

EP - 345

JO - Global studies of childhood

JF - Global studies of childhood

SN - 2043-6106

IS - 3

ER -