The persistent presidential dummy

John G. Powell*, Shi Jing, Tom Smith, Robert E. Whaley

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)


Is a Republican or a Democratic party president better for the stock market? Although many observers discuss this issue in only casual terms, one recently published academic study claims to have documented that the market does significantly better under Democratic party administrations. Despite widespread publicity about this in the financial press, the study's results and conclusions are biased by faulty statistical tests. Once the methodology is corrected, the differences in stock market returns under different political parties turn out not to be meaningful. The lessons here extend well beyond the presidential political party effect. Proper research design is essential if we are to reach correct conclusions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)133-143
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Portfolio Management
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2007
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'The persistent presidential dummy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this