The political mobilities of reporting

tethering, slickness and asylum control

Daniel X. O. Fisher, Andrew Burridge, Nick Gill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper focuses on the coerced mobilities associated with reporting, meaning the mandatory requirement to regularly check-in with authorities for the purpose of control. Drawing on recent calls for a politics of mobility and advances in carceral geographies, we attend to the forces, movements, speeds and affective materialities of reporting with a focus on deportable migrants and the UK Home Office. In doing so we develop two conceptual lenses through which to further understand the politics of mobility. First, we develop the concept of ‘slickness’ in the context of the process of becoming detained at a reporting event. We understand slickness as a property of bodies and objects that makes them easier to move. Second, we argue that reporting functions to ‘tether’ deportable migrants; thereby not only fixing them in place, but also forcing the expenditure of energy and the experience of punishment. The result is that reporting blurs the distinction between detention and ‘freedom’ by enacting the carceral in everyday spaces.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)632-647
Number of pages16
JournalMobilities
Volume14
Issue number5
Early online date10 Jun 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2019. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • asylum
  • detention
  • Mobility
  • reporting
  • slickness
  • tethering

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The political mobilities of reporting: tethering, slickness and asylum control'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this