The Politics of Immunity

Reading Cohen through Canguilhem and New Materialism

Michelle Jamieson*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The issue of what is proper to nature, or life itself, is central to critical accounts of biomedicine and its complex interrelations with social, political and economic forces. These engagements, namely biopolitical accounts of medical practices and ethical-political critiques of biomedical discourse, grapple with the indistinction between the political and biological that biomedicine enacts. Making a significant contribution to both literatures, Ed Cohen’s A Body Worth Defending argues that the emergence of the concept of biological immunity signals the entry of politics into life itself and, as such, constitutes a concrete example of biopolitics. This article examines Cohen’s account of how the political becomes biological, and the view of life it assumes. Seeking to open up the question of biology, it draws on the work of Georges Canguilhem, and New Materialist accounts of matter–meaning entanglement, to offer a reading of knowledge and life, or politics and biology, as ontologically entangled.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)106-129
Number of pages24
JournalBody and Society
Volume22
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2016

Keywords

  • Canguilhem
  • Ed Cohen
  • Foucault
  • New Materialism
  • biology
  • biomedical discourse
  • biopolitics
  • immunity

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The Politics of Immunity: Reading Cohen through Canguilhem and New Materialism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this