The qualitative representation of physical systems

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The representation of physical systems using qualitative formalisms is examined in this review, with an emphasis on recent developments in the area. The push to develop reasoning systems incorporating deep knowledge originally focused on naive physical representations, but has now shifted to more formal ones based on qualitative mathematics. The qualitative differential constraint formalism used in systems like QSIM is examined, and current efforts to link this to competing representations like Qualitative Process Theory are noted. Inference and representation are intertwined, and the decision to represent notions like causality explicitly, or infer it from other properties, has shifted as the field has developed. The evolution of causal and functional representations is thus examined. Finally, a growing body of work that allows reasoning systems to utilize multiple representations of a system is identified. Dimensions along which multiple model hierarchies could be constructed are examined, including mode of behaviour, granularity, ontology, and representational depth.

LanguageEnglish
Pages55-77
Number of pages23
JournalThe Knowledge Engineering Review
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ontology

Cite this

@article{3d09d7f5e97e4737a7779f6b5d73f9ad,
title = "The qualitative representation of physical systems",
abstract = "The representation of physical systems using qualitative formalisms is examined in this review, with an emphasis on recent developments in the area. The push to develop reasoning systems incorporating deep knowledge originally focused on naive physical representations, but has now shifted to more formal ones based on qualitative mathematics. The qualitative differential constraint formalism used in systems like QSIM is examined, and current efforts to link this to competing representations like Qualitative Process Theory are noted. Inference and representation are intertwined, and the decision to represent notions like causality explicitly, or infer it from other properties, has shifted as the field has developed. The evolution of causal and functional representations is thus examined. Finally, a growing body of work that allows reasoning systems to utilize multiple representations of a system is identified. Dimensions along which multiple model hierarchies could be constructed are examined, including mode of behaviour, granularity, ontology, and representational depth.",
author = "Enrico Coiera",
year = "1992",
doi = "10.1017/S0269888900006159",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "55--77",
journal = "The Knowledge Engineering Review",
issn = "0269-8889",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

The qualitative representation of physical systems. / Coiera, Enrico.

In: The Knowledge Engineering Review, Vol. 7, No. 1, 1992, p. 55-77.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The qualitative representation of physical systems

AU - Coiera, Enrico

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - The representation of physical systems using qualitative formalisms is examined in this review, with an emphasis on recent developments in the area. The push to develop reasoning systems incorporating deep knowledge originally focused on naive physical representations, but has now shifted to more formal ones based on qualitative mathematics. The qualitative differential constraint formalism used in systems like QSIM is examined, and current efforts to link this to competing representations like Qualitative Process Theory are noted. Inference and representation are intertwined, and the decision to represent notions like causality explicitly, or infer it from other properties, has shifted as the field has developed. The evolution of causal and functional representations is thus examined. Finally, a growing body of work that allows reasoning systems to utilize multiple representations of a system is identified. Dimensions along which multiple model hierarchies could be constructed are examined, including mode of behaviour, granularity, ontology, and representational depth.

AB - The representation of physical systems using qualitative formalisms is examined in this review, with an emphasis on recent developments in the area. The push to develop reasoning systems incorporating deep knowledge originally focused on naive physical representations, but has now shifted to more formal ones based on qualitative mathematics. The qualitative differential constraint formalism used in systems like QSIM is examined, and current efforts to link this to competing representations like Qualitative Process Theory are noted. Inference and representation are intertwined, and the decision to represent notions like causality explicitly, or infer it from other properties, has shifted as the field has developed. The evolution of causal and functional representations is thus examined. Finally, a growing body of work that allows reasoning systems to utilize multiple representations of a system is identified. Dimensions along which multiple model hierarchies could be constructed are examined, including mode of behaviour, granularity, ontology, and representational depth.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84972354739&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0269888900006159

DO - 10.1017/S0269888900006159

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 55

EP - 77

JO - The Knowledge Engineering Review

T2 - The Knowledge Engineering Review

JF - The Knowledge Engineering Review

SN - 0269-8889

IS - 1

ER -