The quality of cardiovascular disease prevention in rural primary care

Ann Allenby, Leigh Kinsman, Rachel Tham, Julie Symons, Mike Jones, Stephen Campbell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To measure the differences in the recording of risk factors and lifestyle advice between those at high risk of cardiovascular disease and those diagnosed with cardiovascular disease, and to identify the practice characteristics associated with such recording in rural primary care. Design: A cross-sectional observation study of 14 general practices. Medical records were audited to measure recording of risk factors and lifestyle advice for those at high risk of and those diagnosed with cardiovascular disease. Practice characteristics were collected, with logistic regression used to test for an association with the recording of risk factors. Setting: General practices in rural Australia. Participants: Each practice was asked to identify 20 patients; 10 at high risk and 10 diagnosed with cardiovascular disease. Main outcome measures: The recording of risk factors and lifestyle advice in patient records and practice characteristics. Results: 282 records were audited with 142 being high risk and 140 diagnosed with cardiovascular disease.Measures recorded significantly less in the high-risk group were: blood pressure (94% versus 99%; P=0.019); physical activity (24% versus 56%; P=0.000); dietary advice (32% versus 51%; P=0.001); and physical activity advice (34% versus 56%; P=0.000). Recording of risk factors was positively associated with practice involvement in quality improvement (P<0.001), continuing education (P<0.001), and greater percentage of general practitioners (P<0.05) and practice nurses (P<0.001). Conclusions: There is substantial room for enhanced cardiovascular disease prevention through rural primary care in Australia, particularly for high-risk patients. This study has demonstrated an association between practice factors (including targeted education, quality improvement activities and appropriate workforce) and improved preventive activities.

LanguageEnglish
Pages92-98
Number of pages7
JournalAustralian Journal of Rural Health
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2016

Fingerprint

Primary Health Care
Cardiovascular Diseases
Life Style
Quality Improvement
General Practice
Exercise
Continuing Education
General Practitioners
Medical Records
Cross-Sectional Studies
Logistic Models
Nurses
Observation
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Blood Pressure
Education

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2015. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Cite this

Allenby, Ann ; Kinsman, Leigh ; Tham, Rachel ; Symons, Julie ; Jones, Mike ; Campbell, Stephen. / The quality of cardiovascular disease prevention in rural primary care. In: Australian Journal of Rural Health. 2016 ; Vol. 24, No. 2. pp. 92-98.
@article{3e438e0660d542f48654929a88aea6e1,
title = "The quality of cardiovascular disease prevention in rural primary care",
abstract = "Objective: To measure the differences in the recording of risk factors and lifestyle advice between those at high risk of cardiovascular disease and those diagnosed with cardiovascular disease, and to identify the practice characteristics associated with such recording in rural primary care. Design: A cross-sectional observation study of 14 general practices. Medical records were audited to measure recording of risk factors and lifestyle advice for those at high risk of and those diagnosed with cardiovascular disease. Practice characteristics were collected, with logistic regression used to test for an association with the recording of risk factors. Setting: General practices in rural Australia. Participants: Each practice was asked to identify 20 patients; 10 at high risk and 10 diagnosed with cardiovascular disease. Main outcome measures: The recording of risk factors and lifestyle advice in patient records and practice characteristics. Results: 282 records were audited with 142 being high risk and 140 diagnosed with cardiovascular disease.Measures recorded significantly less in the high-risk group were: blood pressure (94{\%} versus 99{\%}; P=0.019); physical activity (24{\%} versus 56{\%}; P=0.000); dietary advice (32{\%} versus 51{\%}; P=0.001); and physical activity advice (34{\%} versus 56{\%}; P=0.000). Recording of risk factors was positively associated with practice involvement in quality improvement (P<0.001), continuing education (P<0.001), and greater percentage of general practitioners (P<0.05) and practice nurses (P<0.001). Conclusions: There is substantial room for enhanced cardiovascular disease prevention through rural primary care in Australia, particularly for high-risk patients. This study has demonstrated an association between practice factors (including targeted education, quality improvement activities and appropriate workforce) and improved preventive activities.",
author = "Ann Allenby and Leigh Kinsman and Rachel Tham and Julie Symons and Mike Jones and Stephen Campbell",
note = "Copyright the Author(s) 2015. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ajr.12224",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "92--98",
journal = "The Australian journal of rural health",
issn = "1038-5282",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell, Wiley",
number = "2",

}

The quality of cardiovascular disease prevention in rural primary care. / Allenby, Ann; Kinsman, Leigh; Tham, Rachel; Symons, Julie; Jones, Mike; Campbell, Stephen.

In: Australian Journal of Rural Health, Vol. 24, No. 2, 01.04.2016, p. 92-98.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The quality of cardiovascular disease prevention in rural primary care

AU - Allenby, Ann

AU - Kinsman, Leigh

AU - Tham, Rachel

AU - Symons, Julie

AU - Jones, Mike

AU - Campbell, Stephen

N1 - Copyright the Author(s) 2015. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - Objective: To measure the differences in the recording of risk factors and lifestyle advice between those at high risk of cardiovascular disease and those diagnosed with cardiovascular disease, and to identify the practice characteristics associated with such recording in rural primary care. Design: A cross-sectional observation study of 14 general practices. Medical records were audited to measure recording of risk factors and lifestyle advice for those at high risk of and those diagnosed with cardiovascular disease. Practice characteristics were collected, with logistic regression used to test for an association with the recording of risk factors. Setting: General practices in rural Australia. Participants: Each practice was asked to identify 20 patients; 10 at high risk and 10 diagnosed with cardiovascular disease. Main outcome measures: The recording of risk factors and lifestyle advice in patient records and practice characteristics. Results: 282 records were audited with 142 being high risk and 140 diagnosed with cardiovascular disease.Measures recorded significantly less in the high-risk group were: blood pressure (94% versus 99%; P=0.019); physical activity (24% versus 56%; P=0.000); dietary advice (32% versus 51%; P=0.001); and physical activity advice (34% versus 56%; P=0.000). Recording of risk factors was positively associated with practice involvement in quality improvement (P<0.001), continuing education (P<0.001), and greater percentage of general practitioners (P<0.05) and practice nurses (P<0.001). Conclusions: There is substantial room for enhanced cardiovascular disease prevention through rural primary care in Australia, particularly for high-risk patients. This study has demonstrated an association between practice factors (including targeted education, quality improvement activities and appropriate workforce) and improved preventive activities.

AB - Objective: To measure the differences in the recording of risk factors and lifestyle advice between those at high risk of cardiovascular disease and those diagnosed with cardiovascular disease, and to identify the practice characteristics associated with such recording in rural primary care. Design: A cross-sectional observation study of 14 general practices. Medical records were audited to measure recording of risk factors and lifestyle advice for those at high risk of and those diagnosed with cardiovascular disease. Practice characteristics were collected, with logistic regression used to test for an association with the recording of risk factors. Setting: General practices in rural Australia. Participants: Each practice was asked to identify 20 patients; 10 at high risk and 10 diagnosed with cardiovascular disease. Main outcome measures: The recording of risk factors and lifestyle advice in patient records and practice characteristics. Results: 282 records were audited with 142 being high risk and 140 diagnosed with cardiovascular disease.Measures recorded significantly less in the high-risk group were: blood pressure (94% versus 99%; P=0.019); physical activity (24% versus 56%; P=0.000); dietary advice (32% versus 51%; P=0.001); and physical activity advice (34% versus 56%; P=0.000). Recording of risk factors was positively associated with practice involvement in quality improvement (P<0.001), continuing education (P<0.001), and greater percentage of general practitioners (P<0.05) and practice nurses (P<0.001). Conclusions: There is substantial room for enhanced cardiovascular disease prevention through rural primary care in Australia, particularly for high-risk patients. This study has demonstrated an association between practice factors (including targeted education, quality improvement activities and appropriate workforce) and improved preventive activities.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939131266&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ajr.12224

DO - 10.1111/ajr.12224

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 92

EP - 98

JO - The Australian journal of rural health

T2 - The Australian journal of rural health

JF - The Australian journal of rural health

SN - 1038-5282

IS - 2

ER -