Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The relative effectiveness of extinction and counter-conditioning in diminishing children's fear

Carol Newall*, Tiffany Watson, Kerry Ann Grant, Rick Richardson

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

    Abstract

    Two behavioural strategies for reducing learned fear are extinction and counter-conditioning, and in this study we compared the relative effectiveness of the two procedures at diminishing fear in children. Seventy-three children aged 7–12 years old (M = 9.30, SD = 1.62) were exposed to pictures of two novel animals on a computer screen during the fear acquisition phase. One of these animals was paired with a picture of a scared human face (CS+) while the other was not (CS-). The children were then randomly assigned to one of three conditions: counter-conditioning (animal paired with a happy face), extinction (animal without scared face), or control (no fear reduction procedure). Changes in fear beliefs and behavioural avoidance of the animal were measured. Counter-conditioning was more effective at reducing fear to the CS + than extinction. The findings are discussed in terms of implications for behavioural treatments of childhood anxiety disorders.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)42-49
    Number of pages8
    JournalBehaviour Research and Therapy
    Volume95
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2017

    Keywords

    • Anxiety
    • Child
    • Counter-conditioning
    • Extinction
    • Fear
    • Vicarious learning

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The relative effectiveness of extinction and counter-conditioning in diminishing children's fear'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this