The relative importance of audit quality attributes

Alan Kilgore*, Renee Radich, Graeme Harrison

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Corporate collapses and audit failures have threatened the credibility of the audit function, with audit quality once again being a major issue. Motivated by the significance of auditing and perceptions of audit quality in enhancing the reliability and credibility of financial statements, this article investigates the relative importance of audit team and audit firm attributes in perceptions of audit quality by users of audit services. Data are gathered from 81 users of audit services and analysed using adaptive conjoint analysis in order to measure the relative importance of audit team and audit firm attributes in perceptions of audit quality. The results show that, in general, users of audit services perceive audit team attributes as being relatively more important than audit firm attributes in perceptions of audit quality. The findings of the study have implications for regulators and the accounting profession concerned with improving confidence in corporate governance and the effectiveness and integrity of the audit process, and for audit firms in monitoring and promoting the quality of their audit services.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)253-265
Number of pages13
JournalAustralian Accounting Review
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2011

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The relative importance of audit quality attributes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this