The reliability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of bone mineral density in the metatarsals

Joel T. Fuller, Jane Archer, Jonathan D. Buckley, Margarita D. Tsiros, Dominic Thewlis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the reliability of a simple, efficient technique for measuring bone mineral density (BMD) in the metatarsals using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Materials and methods: BMD of the right foot of 32 trained male distance runners was measured using a DXA scanner with the foot in the plantar position. Separate regions of interest (ROI) were used to assess the BMD of each metatarsal shaft (1st–5th) for each participant. ROI analysis was repeated by the same investigator to determine within-scan intra-rater reliability and by a different investigator to determine within-scan inter-rater reliability. Repeat DXA scans were undertaken for ten participants to assess between-scan intra-rater reliability. Results: Assessment of BMD was consistently most reliable for the first metatarsal across all domains of reliability assessed (intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC] ≥0.97; coefficient of variation [CV] ≤1.5 %; limits of agreement [LOA] ≤4.2 %). Reasonable levels of intra-rater reliability were also achieved for the second and fifth metatarsals (ICC ≥0.90; CV ≤4.2 %; LOA ≤11.9 %). Poorer levels of reliability were demonstrated for the third (ICC ≥0.64; CV ≤8.2 %; LOA ≤23.6 %) and fourth metatarsals (ICC ≥0.67; CV ≤9.6 %; LOA ≤27.5 %). BMD was greatest in the first and second metatarsals (P < 0.01). Conclusion: Reliable measurements of BMD were achieved for the first, second and fifth metatarsals.

LanguageEnglish
Pages135-140
Number of pages6
JournalSkeletal Radiology
Volume45
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Metatarsal Bones
Photon Absorptiometry
Bone Density
Foot
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • Bone mineral density
  • Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
  • Metatarsal
  • Reliability

Cite this

Fuller, Joel T. ; Archer, Jane ; Buckley, Jonathan D. ; Tsiros, Margarita D. ; Thewlis, Dominic. / The reliability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of bone mineral density in the metatarsals. In: Skeletal Radiology. 2016 ; Vol. 45, No. 1. pp. 135-140.
@article{9cd3c137a51844ab8ba492dfbd6fa74a,
title = "The reliability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of bone mineral density in the metatarsals",
abstract = "Objective: To investigate the reliability of a simple, efficient technique for measuring bone mineral density (BMD) in the metatarsals using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Materials and methods: BMD of the right foot of 32 trained male distance runners was measured using a DXA scanner with the foot in the plantar position. Separate regions of interest (ROI) were used to assess the BMD of each metatarsal shaft (1st–5th) for each participant. ROI analysis was repeated by the same investigator to determine within-scan intra-rater reliability and by a different investigator to determine within-scan inter-rater reliability. Repeat DXA scans were undertaken for ten participants to assess between-scan intra-rater reliability. Results: Assessment of BMD was consistently most reliable for the first metatarsal across all domains of reliability assessed (intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC] ≥0.97; coefficient of variation [CV] ≤1.5 {\%}; limits of agreement [LOA] ≤4.2 {\%}). Reasonable levels of intra-rater reliability were also achieved for the second and fifth metatarsals (ICC ≥0.90; CV ≤4.2 {\%}; LOA ≤11.9 {\%}). Poorer levels of reliability were demonstrated for the third (ICC ≥0.64; CV ≤8.2 {\%}; LOA ≤23.6 {\%}) and fourth metatarsals (ICC ≥0.67; CV ≤9.6 {\%}; LOA ≤27.5 {\%}). BMD was greatest in the first and second metatarsals (P < 0.01). Conclusion: Reliable measurements of BMD were achieved for the first, second and fifth metatarsals.",
keywords = "Bone mineral density, Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, Metatarsal, Reliability",
author = "Fuller, {Joel T.} and Jane Archer and Buckley, {Jonathan D.} and Tsiros, {Margarita D.} and Dominic Thewlis",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00256-015-2227-0",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "135--140",
journal = "Skeletal Radiology",
issn = "0364-2348",
publisher = "Springer, Springer Nature",
number = "1",

}

The reliability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of bone mineral density in the metatarsals. / Fuller, Joel T.; Archer, Jane; Buckley, Jonathan D.; Tsiros, Margarita D.; Thewlis, Dominic.

In: Skeletal Radiology, Vol. 45, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 135-140.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The reliability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of bone mineral density in the metatarsals

AU - Fuller, Joel T.

AU - Archer, Jane

AU - Buckley, Jonathan D.

AU - Tsiros, Margarita D.

AU - Thewlis, Dominic

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Objective: To investigate the reliability of a simple, efficient technique for measuring bone mineral density (BMD) in the metatarsals using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Materials and methods: BMD of the right foot of 32 trained male distance runners was measured using a DXA scanner with the foot in the plantar position. Separate regions of interest (ROI) were used to assess the BMD of each metatarsal shaft (1st–5th) for each participant. ROI analysis was repeated by the same investigator to determine within-scan intra-rater reliability and by a different investigator to determine within-scan inter-rater reliability. Repeat DXA scans were undertaken for ten participants to assess between-scan intra-rater reliability. Results: Assessment of BMD was consistently most reliable for the first metatarsal across all domains of reliability assessed (intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC] ≥0.97; coefficient of variation [CV] ≤1.5 %; limits of agreement [LOA] ≤4.2 %). Reasonable levels of intra-rater reliability were also achieved for the second and fifth metatarsals (ICC ≥0.90; CV ≤4.2 %; LOA ≤11.9 %). Poorer levels of reliability were demonstrated for the third (ICC ≥0.64; CV ≤8.2 %; LOA ≤23.6 %) and fourth metatarsals (ICC ≥0.67; CV ≤9.6 %; LOA ≤27.5 %). BMD was greatest in the first and second metatarsals (P < 0.01). Conclusion: Reliable measurements of BMD were achieved for the first, second and fifth metatarsals.

AB - Objective: To investigate the reliability of a simple, efficient technique for measuring bone mineral density (BMD) in the metatarsals using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Materials and methods: BMD of the right foot of 32 trained male distance runners was measured using a DXA scanner with the foot in the plantar position. Separate regions of interest (ROI) were used to assess the BMD of each metatarsal shaft (1st–5th) for each participant. ROI analysis was repeated by the same investigator to determine within-scan intra-rater reliability and by a different investigator to determine within-scan inter-rater reliability. Repeat DXA scans were undertaken for ten participants to assess between-scan intra-rater reliability. Results: Assessment of BMD was consistently most reliable for the first metatarsal across all domains of reliability assessed (intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC] ≥0.97; coefficient of variation [CV] ≤1.5 %; limits of agreement [LOA] ≤4.2 %). Reasonable levels of intra-rater reliability were also achieved for the second and fifth metatarsals (ICC ≥0.90; CV ≤4.2 %; LOA ≤11.9 %). Poorer levels of reliability were demonstrated for the third (ICC ≥0.64; CV ≤8.2 %; LOA ≤23.6 %) and fourth metatarsals (ICC ≥0.67; CV ≤9.6 %; LOA ≤27.5 %). BMD was greatest in the first and second metatarsals (P < 0.01). Conclusion: Reliable measurements of BMD were achieved for the first, second and fifth metatarsals.

KW - Bone mineral density

KW - Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

KW - Metatarsal

KW - Reliability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949104055&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00256-015-2227-0

DO - 10.1007/s00256-015-2227-0

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 135

EP - 140

JO - Skeletal Radiology

T2 - Skeletal Radiology

JF - Skeletal Radiology

SN - 0364-2348

IS - 1

ER -