The role of cognition in fitness to stand trial: a systematic review

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The aim of the current paper was to systematically review the quality and design of the literature examining cognition and fitness to stand trial (FST). Ten empirical studies published between 1970 and July 2013 met the inclusion criteria. All studies utilised cross-sectional designs and six were prospective. Study quality was appraised based on FST research guidelines. The study quality was highly variable. Intelligence was controlled statistically in only half of the included studies. Cognitive processes, specifically, processing speed, verbal memory and visuoperceptual skills differentiated fit and unfit groups. Aspects of executive functioning, including social knowledge and abstract thinking, influenced FST. Future studies should use prospective consecutive designs and multivariate statistical strategies that control for potential confounds. Comprehensive assessment across a number of cognitive domains is needed in order to validate research conducted to date and guide forensic assessment of FST.

LanguageEnglish
Pages77-99
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Cognition
Intelligence
Research
Cross-Sectional Studies
Guidelines
Thinking

Cite this

@article{7a7bb49347e14116a1563d11b5cc140c,
title = "The role of cognition in fitness to stand trial: a systematic review",
abstract = "The aim of the current paper was to systematically review the quality and design of the literature examining cognition and fitness to stand trial (FST). Ten empirical studies published between 1970 and July 2013 met the inclusion criteria. All studies utilised cross-sectional designs and six were prospective. Study quality was appraised based on FST research guidelines. The study quality was highly variable. Intelligence was controlled statistically in only half of the included studies. Cognitive processes, specifically, processing speed, verbal memory and visuoperceptual skills differentiated fit and unfit groups. Aspects of executive functioning, including social knowledge and abstract thinking, influenced FST. Future studies should use prospective consecutive designs and multivariate statistical strategies that control for potential confounds. Comprehensive assessment across a number of cognitive domains is needed in order to validate research conducted to date and guide forensic assessment of FST.",
author = "White, {Amanda Jane} and Susanne Meares and Jennifer Batchelor",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/14789949.2013.868916",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "77--99",
journal = "Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology",
issn = "1478-9949",
publisher = "Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group",
number = "1",

}

The role of cognition in fitness to stand trial : a systematic review. / White, Amanda Jane; Meares, Susanne; Batchelor, Jennifer.

In: Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2014, p. 77-99.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of cognition in fitness to stand trial

T2 - Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology

AU - White, Amanda Jane

AU - Meares, Susanne

AU - Batchelor, Jennifer

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The aim of the current paper was to systematically review the quality and design of the literature examining cognition and fitness to stand trial (FST). Ten empirical studies published between 1970 and July 2013 met the inclusion criteria. All studies utilised cross-sectional designs and six were prospective. Study quality was appraised based on FST research guidelines. The study quality was highly variable. Intelligence was controlled statistically in only half of the included studies. Cognitive processes, specifically, processing speed, verbal memory and visuoperceptual skills differentiated fit and unfit groups. Aspects of executive functioning, including social knowledge and abstract thinking, influenced FST. Future studies should use prospective consecutive designs and multivariate statistical strategies that control for potential confounds. Comprehensive assessment across a number of cognitive domains is needed in order to validate research conducted to date and guide forensic assessment of FST.

AB - The aim of the current paper was to systematically review the quality and design of the literature examining cognition and fitness to stand trial (FST). Ten empirical studies published between 1970 and July 2013 met the inclusion criteria. All studies utilised cross-sectional designs and six were prospective. Study quality was appraised based on FST research guidelines. The study quality was highly variable. Intelligence was controlled statistically in only half of the included studies. Cognitive processes, specifically, processing speed, verbal memory and visuoperceptual skills differentiated fit and unfit groups. Aspects of executive functioning, including social knowledge and abstract thinking, influenced FST. Future studies should use prospective consecutive designs and multivariate statistical strategies that control for potential confounds. Comprehensive assessment across a number of cognitive domains is needed in order to validate research conducted to date and guide forensic assessment of FST.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893815385&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14789949.2013.868916

DO - 10.1080/14789949.2013.868916

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 77

EP - 99

JO - Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology

JF - Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology

SN - 1478-9949

IS - 1

ER -