The Role of Cognitive Assessment in Determining Fitness to Stand Trial

Amanda J. White, Jennifer Batchelor, Susan Pulman, Dan Howard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Cognition is often discussed as being of fundamental importance to an accused person's fitness to stand trial (FST); however, there is limited empirical research in this area and no known published research within Australia. The aim of the present paper was to investigate the current practices of experts conducting FST assessments in Australia and to examine the role of cognition in these determinations. Expert reports (328) for 135 accused deemed unfit to stand trial between 2005 and 2010 in New South Wales (NSW) were examined. Collected data included the cognitive domains assessed, assessment techniques employed, the relationship between cognition and the Presser criteria, and demographic information. Results supported the hypothesis that cognition plays an important role in FST, in particular attention and memory; although there was significant variability in the practices and assessment methods of assessors. Results indicate a need for further research investigating the relationship between cognition and FST; as well as training and education for psychologists conducting FST assessments in Australia.

LanguageEnglish
Pages102-109
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Forensic Mental Health
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2012

Fingerprint

Cognition
New South Wales
Empirical Research
Research
Demography
Psychology
Education

Cite this

White, Amanda J. ; Batchelor, Jennifer ; Pulman, Susan ; Howard, Dan. / The Role of Cognitive Assessment in Determining Fitness to Stand Trial. In: International Journal of Forensic Mental Health. 2012 ; Vol. 11, No. 2. pp. 102-109.
@article{5a94e366b5054650be8093f60a5f6785,
title = "The Role of Cognitive Assessment in Determining Fitness to Stand Trial",
abstract = "Cognition is often discussed as being of fundamental importance to an accused person's fitness to stand trial (FST); however, there is limited empirical research in this area and no known published research within Australia. The aim of the present paper was to investigate the current practices of experts conducting FST assessments in Australia and to examine the role of cognition in these determinations. Expert reports (328) for 135 accused deemed unfit to stand trial between 2005 and 2010 in New South Wales (NSW) were examined. Collected data included the cognitive domains assessed, assessment techniques employed, the relationship between cognition and the Presser criteria, and demographic information. Results supported the hypothesis that cognition plays an important role in FST, in particular attention and memory; although there was significant variability in the practices and assessment methods of assessors. Results indicate a need for further research investigating the relationship between cognition and FST; as well as training and education for psychologists conducting FST assessments in Australia.",
author = "White, {Amanda J.} and Jennifer Batchelor and Susan Pulman and Dan Howard",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1080/14999013.2012.688091",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "102--109",
journal = "International Journal of Forensic Mental Health",
issn = "1499-9013",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

The Role of Cognitive Assessment in Determining Fitness to Stand Trial. / White, Amanda J.; Batchelor, Jennifer; Pulman, Susan; Howard, Dan.

In: International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, Vol. 11, No. 2, 04.2012, p. 102-109.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Role of Cognitive Assessment in Determining Fitness to Stand Trial

AU - White, Amanda J.

AU - Batchelor, Jennifer

AU - Pulman, Susan

AU - Howard, Dan

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - Cognition is often discussed as being of fundamental importance to an accused person's fitness to stand trial (FST); however, there is limited empirical research in this area and no known published research within Australia. The aim of the present paper was to investigate the current practices of experts conducting FST assessments in Australia and to examine the role of cognition in these determinations. Expert reports (328) for 135 accused deemed unfit to stand trial between 2005 and 2010 in New South Wales (NSW) were examined. Collected data included the cognitive domains assessed, assessment techniques employed, the relationship between cognition and the Presser criteria, and demographic information. Results supported the hypothesis that cognition plays an important role in FST, in particular attention and memory; although there was significant variability in the practices and assessment methods of assessors. Results indicate a need for further research investigating the relationship between cognition and FST; as well as training and education for psychologists conducting FST assessments in Australia.

AB - Cognition is often discussed as being of fundamental importance to an accused person's fitness to stand trial (FST); however, there is limited empirical research in this area and no known published research within Australia. The aim of the present paper was to investigate the current practices of experts conducting FST assessments in Australia and to examine the role of cognition in these determinations. Expert reports (328) for 135 accused deemed unfit to stand trial between 2005 and 2010 in New South Wales (NSW) were examined. Collected data included the cognitive domains assessed, assessment techniques employed, the relationship between cognition and the Presser criteria, and demographic information. Results supported the hypothesis that cognition plays an important role in FST, in particular attention and memory; although there was significant variability in the practices and assessment methods of assessors. Results indicate a need for further research investigating the relationship between cognition and FST; as well as training and education for psychologists conducting FST assessments in Australia.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864743866&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14999013.2012.688091

DO - 10.1080/14999013.2012.688091

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 102

EP - 109

JO - International Journal of Forensic Mental Health

T2 - International Journal of Forensic Mental Health

JF - International Journal of Forensic Mental Health

SN - 1499-9013

IS - 2

ER -