The Role of Cognitive Assessment in Determining Fitness to Stand Trial

Amanda J. White, Jennifer Batchelor, Susan Pulman, Dan Howard

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    20 Citations (Scopus)


    Cognition is often discussed as being of fundamental importance to an accused person's fitness to stand trial (FST); however, there is limited empirical research in this area and no known published research within Australia. The aim of the present paper was to investigate the current practices of experts conducting FST assessments in Australia and to examine the role of cognition in these determinations. Expert reports (328) for 135 accused deemed unfit to stand trial between 2005 and 2010 in New South Wales (NSW) were examined. Collected data included the cognitive domains assessed, assessment techniques employed, the relationship between cognition and the Presser criteria, and demographic information. Results supported the hypothesis that cognition plays an important role in FST, in particular attention and memory; although there was significant variability in the practices and assessment methods of assessors. Results indicate a need for further research investigating the relationship between cognition and FST; as well as training and education for psychologists conducting FST assessments in Australia.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)102-109
    Number of pages8
    JournalInternational Journal of Forensic Mental Health
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 2012


    Dive into the research topics of 'The Role of Cognitive Assessment in Determining Fitness to Stand Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this