The Role of Ethical Leadership Versus Institutional Constraints: A Simulation Study of Financial Misreporting by CEOs

Stephen Chen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

54 Citations (Scopus)
78 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article examines the proposition that a major cause of the major financial accounting scandals that received much publicity around the world was unethical leadership in the companies and compares the role of unethical leaders in a variety of scenarios. Through the use of computer simulation models, it shows how a combination of CEO's narcissism, financial incentive, shareholders' expectations and subordinate silence as well as CEO's dishonesty can do much to explain some of the findings highlighted in recent high profile financial accounting scandals. Furthermore, it shows that the nature and impact of ethical leadership depends greatly on the institutional setting and can be expected to vary greatly by country and culture. In certain circumstances ethical leadership can have either a negligible or even opposite effect to that expected.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)33-52
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Business Ethics
Volume93
Issue numberSUPPL. 1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2010

Keywords

  • CEO's narcissism
  • computer simulation
  • ethical leadership
  • financial incentives
  • financial misreporting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Role of Ethical Leadership Versus Institutional Constraints: A Simulation Study of Financial Misreporting by CEOs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this