Abstract
This paper examines the role of independent expert reports in Australian M&A market. Using a comprehensive sample of 2888 transactions between 1991 and 2013, I find that a “neither fair nor reasonable” opinion forces the acquirer to increase the offer premium by 5%, ceteris paribus. The finding remains robust after controlling for the target's bargaining power measured by the residual values of initial premiums that are not explained by observable firm-deal characteristics. The target that has a weak bargaining position tends to receive less effect of an unfavorable report. In addition, a “fair and reasonable” opinion increases the probability of success, while the unfavorable report does not affect the transaction outcome. I identify the causal effect of expert opinions by differences-in-differences analysis using the Duke case decision.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 149-167 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | International Review of Finance |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2017 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The role of independent expert reports in Australian M&A market'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver