The role of information sources and objective risk status on lymphedema risk-minimization behaviors in women recently diagnosed with breast cancer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose/Objectives: To assess the role of education sources and objective risk status on knowledge and practice of lymphedema risk-minimization behaviors among women recently diagnosed with breast cancer. Research Approach: Prospective survey. Setting: A hospital in Sydney, Australia. Participants: 106 women recently diagnosed with breast cancer at increased risk for developing lymphedema following lymph node dissection. Methodologic Approach: A questionnaire administered at the time of surgery and three months after surgery measured demographics, lymphedema knowledge, lymphedema information sources used, and adherence to risk-minimization recommendations. Main Research Variables: Lymphedema knowledge, source of information used, objective lymphedema risk, and adherence to risk-minimization behaviors. Findings: Knowledge was high and increased over time. Lymphedema information from the clinic (e.g., brochures, nursing staff) was the most cited source. Adherence to recommendations was moderate; nonadherence was mostly for behaviors requiring regular enactment. Regression analysis revealed that only receipt of information from nursing staff and lymphedema knowledge three months after surgery were significant predictors of risk-minimization behaviors. Conclusions: Exposing women to lymphedema risk information at the time of breast cancer diagnosis facilitates increased awareness and enactment of risk-minimization behaviors. Nursing staff play a key role in disseminating this information and in convincing women to perform the recommendations. Interpretation: Provision of lymphedema education by breast clinic staff is critical to ensure that women realize the importance of early detection and treatment. Reminder booster sessions by nursing staff may be beneficial particularly for longer-term knowledge retention and adherence to recommended behaviors.

LanguageEnglish
PagesE27-E36
Number of pages12
JournalOncology Nursing Forum
Volume38
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2011

Fingerprint

Lymphedema
Breast Neoplasms
Nursing Staff
Education
Pamphlets
Lymph Node Excision
Research
Breast
Regression Analysis
Demography

Cite this

@article{afd9775c14fd4db18d77c918123e7eb9,
title = "The role of information sources and objective risk status on lymphedema risk-minimization behaviors in women recently diagnosed with breast cancer",
abstract = "Purpose/Objectives: To assess the role of education sources and objective risk status on knowledge and practice of lymphedema risk-minimization behaviors among women recently diagnosed with breast cancer. Research Approach: Prospective survey. Setting: A hospital in Sydney, Australia. Participants: 106 women recently diagnosed with breast cancer at increased risk for developing lymphedema following lymph node dissection. Methodologic Approach: A questionnaire administered at the time of surgery and three months after surgery measured demographics, lymphedema knowledge, lymphedema information sources used, and adherence to risk-minimization recommendations. Main Research Variables: Lymphedema knowledge, source of information used, objective lymphedema risk, and adherence to risk-minimization behaviors. Findings: Knowledge was high and increased over time. Lymphedema information from the clinic (e.g., brochures, nursing staff) was the most cited source. Adherence to recommendations was moderate; nonadherence was mostly for behaviors requiring regular enactment. Regression analysis revealed that only receipt of information from nursing staff and lymphedema knowledge three months after surgery were significant predictors of risk-minimization behaviors. Conclusions: Exposing women to lymphedema risk information at the time of breast cancer diagnosis facilitates increased awareness and enactment of risk-minimization behaviors. Nursing staff play a key role in disseminating this information and in convincing women to perform the recommendations. Interpretation: Provision of lymphedema education by breast clinic staff is critical to ensure that women realize the importance of early detection and treatment. Reminder booster sessions by nursing staff may be beneficial particularly for longer-term knowledge retention and adherence to recommended behaviors.",
author = "Sherman, {Kerry A.} and Louise Koelmeyer",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1188/11.ONF.E27-E36",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "E27--E36",
journal = "Oncology Nursing Forum",
issn = "0190-535X",
publisher = "Oncology Nursing Society",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of information sources and objective risk status on lymphedema risk-minimization behaviors in women recently diagnosed with breast cancer

AU - Sherman, Kerry A.

AU - Koelmeyer, Louise

PY - 2011/1

Y1 - 2011/1

N2 - Purpose/Objectives: To assess the role of education sources and objective risk status on knowledge and practice of lymphedema risk-minimization behaviors among women recently diagnosed with breast cancer. Research Approach: Prospective survey. Setting: A hospital in Sydney, Australia. Participants: 106 women recently diagnosed with breast cancer at increased risk for developing lymphedema following lymph node dissection. Methodologic Approach: A questionnaire administered at the time of surgery and three months after surgery measured demographics, lymphedema knowledge, lymphedema information sources used, and adherence to risk-minimization recommendations. Main Research Variables: Lymphedema knowledge, source of information used, objective lymphedema risk, and adherence to risk-minimization behaviors. Findings: Knowledge was high and increased over time. Lymphedema information from the clinic (e.g., brochures, nursing staff) was the most cited source. Adherence to recommendations was moderate; nonadherence was mostly for behaviors requiring regular enactment. Regression analysis revealed that only receipt of information from nursing staff and lymphedema knowledge three months after surgery were significant predictors of risk-minimization behaviors. Conclusions: Exposing women to lymphedema risk information at the time of breast cancer diagnosis facilitates increased awareness and enactment of risk-minimization behaviors. Nursing staff play a key role in disseminating this information and in convincing women to perform the recommendations. Interpretation: Provision of lymphedema education by breast clinic staff is critical to ensure that women realize the importance of early detection and treatment. Reminder booster sessions by nursing staff may be beneficial particularly for longer-term knowledge retention and adherence to recommended behaviors.

AB - Purpose/Objectives: To assess the role of education sources and objective risk status on knowledge and practice of lymphedema risk-minimization behaviors among women recently diagnosed with breast cancer. Research Approach: Prospective survey. Setting: A hospital in Sydney, Australia. Participants: 106 women recently diagnosed with breast cancer at increased risk for developing lymphedema following lymph node dissection. Methodologic Approach: A questionnaire administered at the time of surgery and three months after surgery measured demographics, lymphedema knowledge, lymphedema information sources used, and adherence to risk-minimization recommendations. Main Research Variables: Lymphedema knowledge, source of information used, objective lymphedema risk, and adherence to risk-minimization behaviors. Findings: Knowledge was high and increased over time. Lymphedema information from the clinic (e.g., brochures, nursing staff) was the most cited source. Adherence to recommendations was moderate; nonadherence was mostly for behaviors requiring regular enactment. Regression analysis revealed that only receipt of information from nursing staff and lymphedema knowledge three months after surgery were significant predictors of risk-minimization behaviors. Conclusions: Exposing women to lymphedema risk information at the time of breast cancer diagnosis facilitates increased awareness and enactment of risk-minimization behaviors. Nursing staff play a key role in disseminating this information and in convincing women to perform the recommendations. Interpretation: Provision of lymphedema education by breast clinic staff is critical to ensure that women realize the importance of early detection and treatment. Reminder booster sessions by nursing staff may be beneficial particularly for longer-term knowledge retention and adherence to recommended behaviors.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79953096391&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1188/11.ONF.E27-E36

DO - 10.1188/11.ONF.E27-E36

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - E27-E36

JO - Oncology Nursing Forum

T2 - Oncology Nursing Forum

JF - Oncology Nursing Forum

SN - 0190-535X

IS - 1

ER -