Abstract
We examine the pricing and performance of advisers in M&A transactions. We determine adviser quality on the basis of a contemporaneous market share measure and show that high quality advisers receive higher M&A advisory fees. High quality advisers also complete deals faster, but their superiority is not reflected in increasing the likelihood of deal completion or delivering greater abnormal equity returns to their clients. It is well known that stock bids are received more negatively than cash bids, so we further partition the sample of acquirers by consideration type and examine the abnormal returns of each partition. We find that high quality investment banks are able to differentiate themselves by delivering greater abnormal returns to their acquirer clients in deals involving stock.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 341-369 |
Number of pages | 29 |
Journal | Pacific-Basin Finance Journal |
Volume | 16 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sep 2008 |
Keywords
- Advisory fees
- Investment banks
- Quality premium
- Stock bids