TY - JOUR
T1 - The role of molecular studies in lymphoma diagnosis
T2 - A review
AU - Spagnolo, Dominic V.
AU - Ellis, David W.
AU - Juneja, Surender
AU - Leong, Anthony S Y
AU - Miliauskas, John
AU - Norris, Debra L.
AU - Turner, Jenny
PY - 2004/2
Y1 - 2004/2
N2 - Lymphoma classification is based on a multiparametric approach to diagnosis, in which clinical features, morphology, immunophenotype, karyotype and molecular characteristics are important to varying degrees. While in most cases, a diagnosis can be confidently established on the basis of morphology and immunophenotype alone, a small proportion of diagnostically difficult cases will rely on molecular studies to enable a definitive diagnosis. This review discusses the various molecular techniques available including Southern blotting (SB), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) - including multicolour-FISH/spectral karyotyping and comparative genomic hybridisation - and also gene expression profiling using cDNA microarray technology. Emphasis is given to the analysis of antigen receptor gene rearrangements and chromosomal translocations as they relate to lymphoma diagnosis and also in the setting of minimal residual disease (MRD) detection and monitoring. Laboratories performing these tests need to have expertise in these areas of testing, and there is a need for greater standardisation of molecular tests. It is important to know the sensitivity and specificity of each test as well as its limitations and the pitfalls in the interpretation of results. Above all, results of molecular testing should never be considered in isolation, and must always be interpreted in the context of clinical and other laboratory data.
AB - Lymphoma classification is based on a multiparametric approach to diagnosis, in which clinical features, morphology, immunophenotype, karyotype and molecular characteristics are important to varying degrees. While in most cases, a diagnosis can be confidently established on the basis of morphology and immunophenotype alone, a small proportion of diagnostically difficult cases will rely on molecular studies to enable a definitive diagnosis. This review discusses the various molecular techniques available including Southern blotting (SB), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) - including multicolour-FISH/spectral karyotyping and comparative genomic hybridisation - and also gene expression profiling using cDNA microarray technology. Emphasis is given to the analysis of antigen receptor gene rearrangements and chromosomal translocations as they relate to lymphoma diagnosis and also in the setting of minimal residual disease (MRD) detection and monitoring. Laboratories performing these tests need to have expertise in these areas of testing, and there is a need for greater standardisation of molecular tests. It is important to know the sensitivity and specificity of each test as well as its limitations and the pitfalls in the interpretation of results. Above all, results of molecular testing should never be considered in isolation, and must always be interpreted in the context of clinical and other laboratory data.
KW - Diagnosis
KW - DNA microarrays
KW - FISH
KW - Fluorescence in situ hybridisation
KW - Lymphoma
KW - Minimal residual disease
KW - Molecular
KW - MRD
KW - PCR
KW - Polymerase chain reaction
KW - RT-PCR
KW - Southern blotting
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1242343836&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00313020310001648404
DO - 10.1080/00313020310001648404
M3 - Review article
C2 - 14757555
AN - SCOPUS:1242343836
VL - 36
SP - 19
EP - 44
JO - Pathology
JF - Pathology
SN - 1465-3931
IS - 1
ER -