Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The role of targeted versus standard antibiotic prophylaxis in pancreatoduodenectomy in reducing postoperative infectious complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Helen Pham*, Andy Chen, Christopher B. Nahm, Vincent Lam, Tony Pang, Arthur J. Richardson

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Introduction: Infectious complications are common after pancreatoduodenectomy, which in turn are associated with preoperative biliary drainage. Current guidelines recommend a first-generation cephalosporin as perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. However, some studies support the use of targeted antibiotics. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the role of prophylactic targeted antibiotics compared to standard antibiotics in reducing postoperative infections after pancreatoduodenectomy. Methods: A search from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library from 1946 to July 2020 was conducted. Studies were included if they compared targeted antibiotics with standard perioperative antibiotics while including outcome data on surgical site infections (SSI). Targeted therapy was defined as perioperative antibiotics targeting organisms prevalent in bile instrumentation or by culture data obtained from the patient or institution. Outcomes assessed were the rate of SSIs and their microbiology profile. Analyses included demographic data, perioperative antibiotics, postoperative outcomes including microbiology data, and meta-analysis was performed where applicable. Results: Seven studies were included, with a total of 849 patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy. Targeted antibiotics were associated with a significantly lower rate of postoperative SSI compared to standard antibiotic therapy [21.1% vs 41.9%; risk ratios (RR) 0.55, 95% confidence interval 0.37-0.81]. Wound/incisional site infections and organ space infections were lower in patients receiving targeted antibiotic prophylaxis (RR 0.33, P = 0.0002 and RR 0.54, P = 0.0004, respectively). Enterococcus species were the most common bacteria reported. Conclusion: There was a significant reduction in overall SSI rates when targeted antibiotics was used. Current standard antibiotic prophylaxis is inadequate in covering microbes prevalent in postoperative infections developing after pancreatoduodenectomy.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)315-323
    Number of pages9
    JournalAnnals of Surgery
    Volume275
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2022

    Keywords

    • antibiotics
    • infections
    • micro-organisms
    • pancreatoduodenectomy

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The role of targeted versus standard antibiotic prophylaxis in pancreatoduodenectomy in reducing postoperative infectious complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this