The sharemarket performance of Australian venture capital-backed and non-venture capital-backed IPOs

Ray da Silva Rosa, Gerard Velayuthen, Terry Walter*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We assess the initial underpricing and long-run share performance of venture capital (VC)-backed IPOs. We find, as expected, that estimates of underpricing are less severe using Habib and Ljungqvist [Economics Letters 61 (1998) 381] inspired measures that more accurately estimate the true wealth loss to the entrepreneur. However, we find no statistically significant difference in the underpricing of VC backed and non-VC backed IPOs. Further, unlike Lee et al. [Journal of Banking and Finance 20 (1996) 1189], we find that Australian IPOs do not underperform in the after-market. Non-VC capitalbacked and VC-backed firms earn normal returns in the 2 years following listing. Our results are inconsistent with the hypothesis that VC-backed IPOs are certified as high quality by mere virtue of being backed by venture capitalists.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)197-218
Number of pages22
JournalPacific-Basin Finance Journal
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2003

Keywords

  • IPO
  • Long-run performance
  • Underpricing
  • Venture capital

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The sharemarket performance of Australian venture capital-backed and non-venture capital-backed IPOs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this