The significance of the social for child well-being

Tobia Fattore, Jan Mason

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This article responds to the theme of this special edition by drawing on the findings of our research on child well-being, where children linked a holistic understanding of well-being with an emphasis on the socially situated nature of their experiences of well-being. We briefly outline our epistemological approach and methodology, involving a multistage qualitative study with children 8–15 years, about their understandings and experiences of well-being. We discuss the liberal predispositions in well-being research and the ways in which these predispositions exclude discussion of the significance of the social for well-being. We posit an explanation for the disparity between our findings on the significance of the social for child well-being, and the way these topics are marginalised in much research on well-being. In the remainder of the paper we outline the centrality of affective solidarity for children's well-being, how generation structures adult–child relations and frames the ways in which children's experiences of well-being can be facilitated by symmetrical, or jeopardised by asymmetrical, adult–child relations. We conclude by discussing how these conceptions of well-being suggest metaphors of the social which challenge liberal conceptualisations of well-being.

LanguageEnglish
Pages276-289
Number of pages14
JournalChildren and Society
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2017

Fingerprint

child well-being
Child Welfare
well-being
Research
Metaphor
experience
edition
solidarity
metaphor
methodology

Keywords

  • childhood
  • health & well-being

Cite this

Fattore, Tobia ; Mason, Jan. / The significance of the social for child well-being. In: Children and Society. 2017 ; Vol. 31, No. 4. pp. 276-289.
@article{84977f0564e24b3fb5584a447551848d,
title = "The significance of the social for child well-being",
abstract = "This article responds to the theme of this special edition by drawing on the findings of our research on child well-being, where children linked a holistic understanding of well-being with an emphasis on the socially situated nature of their experiences of well-being. We briefly outline our epistemological approach and methodology, involving a multistage qualitative study with children 8–15 years, about their understandings and experiences of well-being. We discuss the liberal predispositions in well-being research and the ways in which these predispositions exclude discussion of the significance of the social for well-being. We posit an explanation for the disparity between our findings on the significance of the social for child well-being, and the way these topics are marginalised in much research on well-being. In the remainder of the paper we outline the centrality of affective solidarity for children's well-being, how generation structures adult–child relations and frames the ways in which children's experiences of well-being can be facilitated by symmetrical, or jeopardised by asymmetrical, adult–child relations. We conclude by discussing how these conceptions of well-being suggest metaphors of the social which challenge liberal conceptualisations of well-being.",
keywords = "childhood, health & well-being",
author = "Tobia Fattore and Jan Mason",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/chso.12205",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "276--289",
journal = "Children and Society",
issn = "0951-0605",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell, Wiley",
number = "4",

}

The significance of the social for child well-being. / Fattore, Tobia; Mason, Jan.

In: Children and Society, Vol. 31, No. 4, 01.07.2017, p. 276-289.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The significance of the social for child well-being

AU - Fattore, Tobia

AU - Mason, Jan

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - This article responds to the theme of this special edition by drawing on the findings of our research on child well-being, where children linked a holistic understanding of well-being with an emphasis on the socially situated nature of their experiences of well-being. We briefly outline our epistemological approach and methodology, involving a multistage qualitative study with children 8–15 years, about their understandings and experiences of well-being. We discuss the liberal predispositions in well-being research and the ways in which these predispositions exclude discussion of the significance of the social for well-being. We posit an explanation for the disparity between our findings on the significance of the social for child well-being, and the way these topics are marginalised in much research on well-being. In the remainder of the paper we outline the centrality of affective solidarity for children's well-being, how generation structures adult–child relations and frames the ways in which children's experiences of well-being can be facilitated by symmetrical, or jeopardised by asymmetrical, adult–child relations. We conclude by discussing how these conceptions of well-being suggest metaphors of the social which challenge liberal conceptualisations of well-being.

AB - This article responds to the theme of this special edition by drawing on the findings of our research on child well-being, where children linked a holistic understanding of well-being with an emphasis on the socially situated nature of their experiences of well-being. We briefly outline our epistemological approach and methodology, involving a multistage qualitative study with children 8–15 years, about their understandings and experiences of well-being. We discuss the liberal predispositions in well-being research and the ways in which these predispositions exclude discussion of the significance of the social for well-being. We posit an explanation for the disparity between our findings on the significance of the social for child well-being, and the way these topics are marginalised in much research on well-being. In the remainder of the paper we outline the centrality of affective solidarity for children's well-being, how generation structures adult–child relations and frames the ways in which children's experiences of well-being can be facilitated by symmetrical, or jeopardised by asymmetrical, adult–child relations. We conclude by discussing how these conceptions of well-being suggest metaphors of the social which challenge liberal conceptualisations of well-being.

KW - childhood

KW - health & well-being

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020418439&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/chso.12205

DO - 10.1111/chso.12205

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 276

EP - 289

JO - Children and Society

T2 - Children and Society

JF - Children and Society

SN - 0951-0605

IS - 4

ER -