The social division of care

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In Australia, as in most developed economies, care has now 'gone public'. It is no longer solely a private, familial concern that can be automatically assigned to women to be undertaken without pay. Nor is it contained in residential institutions or bureaucratic hierarchies. In this paper I consider what is emerging in its place - the 'care deficit' and the new social divisions of care, in which paid care is assuming an ever more important place as a result of significant developments in both social policy and in market-based provisions, especially the expansion of corporate care. Linking recent care theory with the need for a program of empirical research, the paper first considers the lack of consensus on the character and meaning of care, as seen from a number of different theoretical standpoints. Despite important differences in the perspectives on care, common features suggest that there are sound reasons to develop research concepts and tools that would help create the dialogue and sharing of ideas that a more mature field of research and practice requires. A starting point for this is the attempt to demark a clear definition of care. Building on this, I propose the development and use of a broad perspective, which I have termed the social division of care, to provide a joint framework for data collection and for monitoring the changing balances of responsibility for providing care.

LanguageEnglish
Pages137-149
Number of pages13
JournalAustralian Journal of Social Issues
Volume42
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2007

Fingerprint

empirical research
deficit
dialogue
monitoring
responsibility
economy
lack
market
Social Policy

Keywords

  • Ageing
  • Care
  • Social

Cite this

@article{e81d31d938b24ffdb0e49b362a909fd4,
title = "The social division of care",
abstract = "In Australia, as in most developed economies, care has now 'gone public'. It is no longer solely a private, familial concern that can be automatically assigned to women to be undertaken without pay. Nor is it contained in residential institutions or bureaucratic hierarchies. In this paper I consider what is emerging in its place - the 'care deficit' and the new social divisions of care, in which paid care is assuming an ever more important place as a result of significant developments in both social policy and in market-based provisions, especially the expansion of corporate care. Linking recent care theory with the need for a program of empirical research, the paper first considers the lack of consensus on the character and meaning of care, as seen from a number of different theoretical standpoints. Despite important differences in the perspectives on care, common features suggest that there are sound reasons to develop research concepts and tools that would help create the dialogue and sharing of ideas that a more mature field of research and practice requires. A starting point for this is the attempt to demark a clear definition of care. Building on this, I propose the development and use of a broad perspective, which I have termed the social division of care, to provide a joint framework for data collection and for monitoring the changing balances of responsibility for providing care.",
keywords = "Ageing, Care, Social",
author = "Michael Fine",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "137--149",
journal = "Australian Journal of Social Issues",
issn = "1839-4655",
publisher = "Australian Council of Social Service",
number = "2",

}

The social division of care. / Fine, Michael.

In: Australian Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 42, No. 2, 12.2007, p. 137-149.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The social division of care

AU - Fine, Michael

PY - 2007/12

Y1 - 2007/12

N2 - In Australia, as in most developed economies, care has now 'gone public'. It is no longer solely a private, familial concern that can be automatically assigned to women to be undertaken without pay. Nor is it contained in residential institutions or bureaucratic hierarchies. In this paper I consider what is emerging in its place - the 'care deficit' and the new social divisions of care, in which paid care is assuming an ever more important place as a result of significant developments in both social policy and in market-based provisions, especially the expansion of corporate care. Linking recent care theory with the need for a program of empirical research, the paper first considers the lack of consensus on the character and meaning of care, as seen from a number of different theoretical standpoints. Despite important differences in the perspectives on care, common features suggest that there are sound reasons to develop research concepts and tools that would help create the dialogue and sharing of ideas that a more mature field of research and practice requires. A starting point for this is the attempt to demark a clear definition of care. Building on this, I propose the development and use of a broad perspective, which I have termed the social division of care, to provide a joint framework for data collection and for monitoring the changing balances of responsibility for providing care.

AB - In Australia, as in most developed economies, care has now 'gone public'. It is no longer solely a private, familial concern that can be automatically assigned to women to be undertaken without pay. Nor is it contained in residential institutions or bureaucratic hierarchies. In this paper I consider what is emerging in its place - the 'care deficit' and the new social divisions of care, in which paid care is assuming an ever more important place as a result of significant developments in both social policy and in market-based provisions, especially the expansion of corporate care. Linking recent care theory with the need for a program of empirical research, the paper first considers the lack of consensus on the character and meaning of care, as seen from a number of different theoretical standpoints. Despite important differences in the perspectives on care, common features suggest that there are sound reasons to develop research concepts and tools that would help create the dialogue and sharing of ideas that a more mature field of research and practice requires. A starting point for this is the attempt to demark a clear definition of care. Building on this, I propose the development and use of a broad perspective, which I have termed the social division of care, to provide a joint framework for data collection and for monitoring the changing balances of responsibility for providing care.

KW - Ageing

KW - Care

KW - Social

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950697052&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 137

EP - 149

JO - Australian Journal of Social Issues

T2 - Australian Journal of Social Issues

JF - Australian Journal of Social Issues

SN - 1839-4655

IS - 2

ER -