Abstract
In the vast majority of accounts of tattooing, the tattooed body is conceived as the external expression of an inner self. From this conventional humanist understanding of the body/subject it follows that the individual's character and/or intentions can be deciphered simply reading his or her skin. Interestingly, these assumptions have informed the work of criminologists and psychologists who have historically viewed tattooing as a sign of antisocial tendencies and also the work of counterculturalists who are critical of the conclusions drawn by the former. In this paper, I critically analyze these accounts, the assumptions that inform them, and the lived-effects they produce, in turn deploying the notion of somatechnics to offer an alternative approach to bodily inscription.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 129-141 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Studies in Gender and Sexuality |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2009 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The somatechnics of bodily inscription: Tattooing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver