The specificity of the biosocial model to borderline traits

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background: A number of theories have been proposed to account for the development of borderline personality disorder (BPD). The biosocial model considers emotional dysregulation to be central to the disorder, caused in turn by an emotionally vulnerable child being raised in an invalidating environment. This aetiological model is potentially too broad, as many of these constructs may be equally important to other mental health conditions, making the model non-specific to BPD. Method: We sought to contrast the explanatory value of the constructs identified by the biosocial model of BPD to an alternate form of psychopathology (chronic worry), using a nonclinical sample (N=271), via the completion of self-report questionnaires. Results: Childhood emotional vulnerability had a similar relationship to chronic worry as to borderline traits, with emotional dysregulation playing an important role in both disorders. Contrary to the biosocial model′s predictions, the interaction effects between the childhood antecedents were not found to play an important role in either psychopathology. Conclusion: The lack of an interaction effect between invalidating parenting and emotional vulnerability suggests that this aspect of the biosocial model may not be a strong predictor of BPD. Key elements of the biosocial model may have utility as more generic predictors of psychopathology.

LanguageEnglish
Pages27-36
Number of pages10
JournalClinical Psychologist
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2018

Fingerprint

Borderline Personality Disorder
Psychopathology
Parenting
Self Report
Mental Health

Keywords

  • biosocial model
  • borderline personality disorder
  • childhood emotional vulnerability
  • chronic worry
  • emotion dysregulation

Cite this

@article{dcb39f42ee0c4b868319c0a69f0552dc,
title = "The specificity of the biosocial model to borderline traits",
abstract = "Background: A number of theories have been proposed to account for the development of borderline personality disorder (BPD). The biosocial model considers emotional dysregulation to be central to the disorder, caused in turn by an emotionally vulnerable child being raised in an invalidating environment. This aetiological model is potentially too broad, as many of these constructs may be equally important to other mental health conditions, making the model non-specific to BPD. Method: We sought to contrast the explanatory value of the constructs identified by the biosocial model of BPD to an alternate form of psychopathology (chronic worry), using a nonclinical sample (N=271), via the completion of self-report questionnaires. Results: Childhood emotional vulnerability had a similar relationship to chronic worry as to borderline traits, with emotional dysregulation playing an important role in both disorders. Contrary to the biosocial model′s predictions, the interaction effects between the childhood antecedents were not found to play an important role in either psychopathology. Conclusion: The lack of an interaction effect between invalidating parenting and emotional vulnerability suggests that this aspect of the biosocial model may not be a strong predictor of BPD. Key elements of the biosocial model may have utility as more generic predictors of psychopathology.",
keywords = "biosocial model, borderline personality disorder, childhood emotional vulnerability, chronic worry, emotion dysregulation",
author = "Duncan Gill and Wayne Warburton and Ken Beath",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1111/cp.12104",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "27--36",
journal = "Clinical Psychologist",
issn = "1328-4207",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell, Wiley",
number = "1",

}

The specificity of the biosocial model to borderline traits. / Gill, Duncan; Warburton, Wayne; Beath, Ken.

In: Clinical Psychologist, Vol. 22, No. 1, 03.2018, p. 27-36.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The specificity of the biosocial model to borderline traits

AU - Gill, Duncan

AU - Warburton, Wayne

AU - Beath, Ken

PY - 2018/3

Y1 - 2018/3

N2 - Background: A number of theories have been proposed to account for the development of borderline personality disorder (BPD). The biosocial model considers emotional dysregulation to be central to the disorder, caused in turn by an emotionally vulnerable child being raised in an invalidating environment. This aetiological model is potentially too broad, as many of these constructs may be equally important to other mental health conditions, making the model non-specific to BPD. Method: We sought to contrast the explanatory value of the constructs identified by the biosocial model of BPD to an alternate form of psychopathology (chronic worry), using a nonclinical sample (N=271), via the completion of self-report questionnaires. Results: Childhood emotional vulnerability had a similar relationship to chronic worry as to borderline traits, with emotional dysregulation playing an important role in both disorders. Contrary to the biosocial model′s predictions, the interaction effects between the childhood antecedents were not found to play an important role in either psychopathology. Conclusion: The lack of an interaction effect between invalidating parenting and emotional vulnerability suggests that this aspect of the biosocial model may not be a strong predictor of BPD. Key elements of the biosocial model may have utility as more generic predictors of psychopathology.

AB - Background: A number of theories have been proposed to account for the development of borderline personality disorder (BPD). The biosocial model considers emotional dysregulation to be central to the disorder, caused in turn by an emotionally vulnerable child being raised in an invalidating environment. This aetiological model is potentially too broad, as many of these constructs may be equally important to other mental health conditions, making the model non-specific to BPD. Method: We sought to contrast the explanatory value of the constructs identified by the biosocial model of BPD to an alternate form of psychopathology (chronic worry), using a nonclinical sample (N=271), via the completion of self-report questionnaires. Results: Childhood emotional vulnerability had a similar relationship to chronic worry as to borderline traits, with emotional dysregulation playing an important role in both disorders. Contrary to the biosocial model′s predictions, the interaction effects between the childhood antecedents were not found to play an important role in either psychopathology. Conclusion: The lack of an interaction effect between invalidating parenting and emotional vulnerability suggests that this aspect of the biosocial model may not be a strong predictor of BPD. Key elements of the biosocial model may have utility as more generic predictors of psychopathology.

KW - biosocial model

KW - borderline personality disorder

KW - childhood emotional vulnerability

KW - chronic worry

KW - emotion dysregulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84997207246&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/cp.12104

DO - 10.1111/cp.12104

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 27

EP - 36

JO - Clinical Psychologist

T2 - Clinical Psychologist

JF - Clinical Psychologist

SN - 1328-4207

IS - 1

ER -