Abstract
In 1977 Chief Justice Barwick gave one of the first statistical snapshots of the
Australian courts as a ‘judicial system’ in his inaugural ‘State of the Australian
Judicature’ address. Since then, there has been no detailed statistical
examination of the characteristics of the Australian judicature, due in part to the
paucity of reliable data. After the passage of 36 years, this article provides a
second examination of Australian courts and judges using data from the
Productivity Commission and other sources. The article describes and analyses
key attributes and observable trends in the judicature from the perspectives of
both the supply side (judicial labour) and the demand side (court lodgements).
This is done across six domains: size and growth; tiers of the court hierarchy;
state versus federal systems; civil versus criminal subject matter; regional
dynamics; and gender composition. What emerges is a complex picture of a
dynamic judicial system that does not always comport with common
assumptions about its structure and organisation. There is a critical need for the
collection of additional data on the judicature, and for research that provides a
better understanding of the forces that will shape the evolution of the Australian
judicial system over the coming decades.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 489-517 |
| Number of pages | 29 |
| Journal | Sydney Law Review |
| Volume | 35 |
| Publication status | Published - 2013 |