TY - JOUR
T1 - The stolen goods market in New South Wales, Australia
T2 - An analysis of disposal avenues and tactics
AU - Stevenson, Richard J.
AU - Forsythe, Lubica M V
AU - Weatherburn, Don
PY - 2001/12
Y1 - 2001/12
N2 - Lack of information about the stolen goods market has hampered its use by police as a means of controlling burglary rates. This study investigated how the market functions by interviewing 267 imprisoned burglars. It found that burglars used an average of four different methods of disposal. The most common was trading stolen goods directly for drugs - mainly heroin in adults and cannabis in juveniles. Other methods included selling to family/friends, fences, legitimate businesses, pawnbrokers and secondhand dealers. Disposal of stolen goods appeared efficient, profitable and low risk. Many goods were stolen on commission and disposed of quickly, often in under one hour from the burglary. Burglars obtained between 25-33 per cent of the new price for certain stolen goods, earned a median income of AUS$2,000 per week and gave little thought to being caught. Receivers stood to make considerable profits and were also unlikely to be apprehended. The implications of these data for controlling the flow of stolen goods are discussed.
AB - Lack of information about the stolen goods market has hampered its use by police as a means of controlling burglary rates. This study investigated how the market functions by interviewing 267 imprisoned burglars. It found that burglars used an average of four different methods of disposal. The most common was trading stolen goods directly for drugs - mainly heroin in adults and cannabis in juveniles. Other methods included selling to family/friends, fences, legitimate businesses, pawnbrokers and secondhand dealers. Disposal of stolen goods appeared efficient, profitable and low risk. Many goods were stolen on commission and disposed of quickly, often in under one hour from the burglary. Burglars obtained between 25-33 per cent of the new price for certain stolen goods, earned a median income of AUS$2,000 per week and gave little thought to being caught. Receivers stood to make considerable profits and were also unlikely to be apprehended. The implications of these data for controlling the flow of stolen goods are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035582168&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/bjc/41.1.101
DO - 10.1093/bjc/41.1.101
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0035582168
SN - 0007-0955
VL - 41
SP - 101
EP - 118
JO - British Journal of Criminology
JF - British Journal of Criminology
IS - 1
ER -