TY - JOUR
T1 - The synthesized vectorcardiogram resembles the measured vectorcardiogram in patients with dyssynchronous heart failure
AU - Engels, Elien B.
AU - Alshehri, Salih
AU - van Deursen, Caroline J. M.
AU - Wecke, Liliane
AU - Bergfeldt, Lennart
AU - Vernooy, Kevin
AU - Prinzen, Frits W.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Background: The use of vectorcardiography (VCG) has regained interest, however, original Frank-VCG equipment is rare. This study compares the measured VCGs with those synthesized from the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) in patients with heart failure and conduction abnormalities, who are candidate for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Methods: In 92 CRT candidates, Frank-VCG and 12-lead ECG were recorded before CRT implantation. The ECG was converted to a VCG using the Kors method (Kors-VCG) and the two methods were compared using correlation and Bland-Altman analyses. Results: Variables calculated from the Frank- and Kors-VCG showed correlation coefficients between 0.77 and 0.90. There was a significant but small underestimation by the Kors-VCG method, relative bias ranging from - 1.9% ± 4.6% (QRS-T angle) to - 9.4% ± 20.8% (T area). Conclusion: The present study shows that it is justified to use Kors-VCG calculations for VCG analysis, which enables retrospective VCG analysis of previously recorded ECGs in studies related to CRT.
AB - Background: The use of vectorcardiography (VCG) has regained interest, however, original Frank-VCG equipment is rare. This study compares the measured VCGs with those synthesized from the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) in patients with heart failure and conduction abnormalities, who are candidate for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Methods: In 92 CRT candidates, Frank-VCG and 12-lead ECG were recorded before CRT implantation. The ECG was converted to a VCG using the Kors method (Kors-VCG) and the two methods were compared using correlation and Bland-Altman analyses. Results: Variables calculated from the Frank- and Kors-VCG showed correlation coefficients between 0.77 and 0.90. There was a significant but small underestimation by the Kors-VCG method, relative bias ranging from - 1.9% ± 4.6% (QRS-T angle) to - 9.4% ± 20.8% (T area). Conclusion: The present study shows that it is justified to use Kors-VCG calculations for VCG analysis, which enables retrospective VCG analysis of previously recorded ECGs in studies related to CRT.
KW - Vectorcardiography
KW - Kors method
KW - Electrical dyssynchrony
KW - Cardiac resynchronization therapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937729085&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2015.04.001
DO - 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2015.04.001
M3 - Article
C2 - 25900820
SN - 0022-0736
VL - 48
SP - 586
EP - 592
JO - Journal of Electrocardiology
JF - Journal of Electrocardiology
IS - 4
ER -