The unpaid social cost of carbon: Introducing a framework to estimate "legal looting" in the fossil fuel industry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to examine the complex issue of the social cost of carbon. The authors review the existing literature and the strengths and deficiencies of existing approaches. They introduce a simple methodology that estimates the amount of “legal looting” in the fossil fuel industry as an alternative approach to calculate an unpaid social cost of carbon. The “looting amount” can be defined as society’s failure to charge fossil fuel firms for the damage that their activities cause represents an implied subsidy.

Design/methodology/approach: The methodology used in this paper combines decisions in the form of policymakers setting carbon taxes and rational investors investing in carbon emission markets.

Findings: The authors show that the unpaid social cost of carbon in the fossil fuel industry was US$12.7tn over 1995-2013, but may be as high as US$115.5tn.

Originality/value: Over the same period, the sum of industry profits, emission trading scheme carbon permit and carbon tax revenue totalled US$7tn, indicating the industry would not be viable if it was made to pay for damages to society.
LanguageEnglish
Pages122-134
Number of pages13
JournalAccounting Research Journal
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Social costs
Fossil fuels
Industry
Carbon
Methodology
Damage
Carbon tax
Subsidies
Carbon permits
Emissions trading scheme
Tax revenues
Design methodology
Investors
Profit
Carbon emissions
Charge
Politicians
Investing

Keywords

  • Carbon accounting
  • Carbon tax
  • Emissions trading scheme
  • Fossil fuel industry
  • Legal looting
  • Social cost of carbon

Cite this

@article{89bab63a2dc24aa6902ed1a7b3012b24,
title = "The unpaid social cost of carbon: Introducing a framework to estimate {"}legal looting{"} in the fossil fuel industry",
abstract = "Purpose: This paper aims to examine the complex issue of the social cost of carbon. The authors review the existing literature and the strengths and deficiencies of existing approaches. They introduce a simple methodology that estimates the amount of “legal looting” in the fossil fuel industry as an alternative approach to calculate an unpaid social cost of carbon. The “looting amount” can be defined as society’s failure to charge fossil fuel firms for the damage that their activities cause represents an implied subsidy.Design/methodology/approach: The methodology used in this paper combines decisions in the form of policymakers setting carbon taxes and rational investors investing in carbon emission markets.Findings: The authors show that the unpaid social cost of carbon in the fossil fuel industry was US$12.7tn over 1995-2013, but may be as high as US$115.5tn.Originality/value: Over the same period, the sum of industry profits, emission trading scheme carbon permit and carbon tax revenue totalled US$7tn, indicating the industry would not be viable if it was made to pay for damages to society.",
keywords = "Carbon accounting, Carbon tax, Emissions trading scheme, Fossil fuel industry, Legal looting, Social cost of carbon",
author = "Linnenluecke, {Martina K.} and Tom Smith and Whaley, {Robert E.}",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1108/ARJ-08-2017-0138",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "122--134",
journal = "Accounting Research Journal",
issn = "1030-9616",
publisher = "QUT",
number = "2",

}

The unpaid social cost of carbon : Introducing a framework to estimate "legal looting" in the fossil fuel industry. / Linnenluecke, Martina K.; Smith, Tom; Whaley, Robert E.

In: Accounting Research Journal, Vol. 31, No. 2, 2018, p. 122-134.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The unpaid social cost of carbon

T2 - Accounting Research Journal

AU - Linnenluecke, Martina K.

AU - Smith, Tom

AU - Whaley, Robert E.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Purpose: This paper aims to examine the complex issue of the social cost of carbon. The authors review the existing literature and the strengths and deficiencies of existing approaches. They introduce a simple methodology that estimates the amount of “legal looting” in the fossil fuel industry as an alternative approach to calculate an unpaid social cost of carbon. The “looting amount” can be defined as society’s failure to charge fossil fuel firms for the damage that their activities cause represents an implied subsidy.Design/methodology/approach: The methodology used in this paper combines decisions in the form of policymakers setting carbon taxes and rational investors investing in carbon emission markets.Findings: The authors show that the unpaid social cost of carbon in the fossil fuel industry was US$12.7tn over 1995-2013, but may be as high as US$115.5tn.Originality/value: Over the same period, the sum of industry profits, emission trading scheme carbon permit and carbon tax revenue totalled US$7tn, indicating the industry would not be viable if it was made to pay for damages to society.

AB - Purpose: This paper aims to examine the complex issue of the social cost of carbon. The authors review the existing literature and the strengths and deficiencies of existing approaches. They introduce a simple methodology that estimates the amount of “legal looting” in the fossil fuel industry as an alternative approach to calculate an unpaid social cost of carbon. The “looting amount” can be defined as society’s failure to charge fossil fuel firms for the damage that their activities cause represents an implied subsidy.Design/methodology/approach: The methodology used in this paper combines decisions in the form of policymakers setting carbon taxes and rational investors investing in carbon emission markets.Findings: The authors show that the unpaid social cost of carbon in the fossil fuel industry was US$12.7tn over 1995-2013, but may be as high as US$115.5tn.Originality/value: Over the same period, the sum of industry profits, emission trading scheme carbon permit and carbon tax revenue totalled US$7tn, indicating the industry would not be viable if it was made to pay for damages to society.

KW - Carbon accounting

KW - Carbon tax

KW - Emissions trading scheme

KW - Fossil fuel industry

KW - Legal looting

KW - Social cost of carbon

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053237244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/ARJ-08-2017-0138

DO - 10.1108/ARJ-08-2017-0138

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 122

EP - 134

JO - Accounting Research Journal

JF - Accounting Research Journal

SN - 1030-9616

IS - 2

ER -