The Use of dynamic cues in self and familiar face recognition

Rachel Bennetts, Darren Burke, Kevin R. Brooks, Rachel A. Robbins

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceeding contributionResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Familiarity plays an important role in face processing. The importance of familiarity is increased when facial form cues are degraded, so that a person must rely primarily on movement (dynamic) information to identify someone. It is, however, unclear which dynamic cues are used for face recognition of both familiar and unfamiliar faces. Furthermore, little work has been done on dynamic self-face recognition, and none has focused on the type of movement that facilitates this process. The current study used motion capture cameras to record and isolate facial movements in order to test recognition of self, familiar and unfamiliar faces. Participants completed a 2AFC same/different face-matching task involving point-light displays of natural motion (i.e. both rigid and non-rigid motion), rigid motion only (e.g. nodding/shaking), non-rigid motion only (e.g. mouth/eyebrow motion) and still images to determine whether differences in familiarity resulted in the use of different movement cues. The manner (style) in which someone is speaking may also impact on whether they can be easily identified from dynamic cues. Consequently, speech style was either matched or mismatched between video clips. We found that matching performance was more accurate overall when speech style was matched than mismatched. Familiar face matching appears to use rigid, non-rigid and natural movement cues equally, but unfamiliar and self-face matching are more accurate for rigid than natural motion when speech style differs between clips. These results are discussed in relation to previous research on dynamic face recognition, and possible implications for current face processing models.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationASCS09
Subtitle of host publicationproceedings of the 9th Conference of the Australasian Society for Cognitive Science
EditorsWayne Christensen, Elizabeth Schier, John Sutton
Place of PublicationNorth Ryde, NSW
PublisherMacquarie Centre for Cognitive Science
Pages21-27
Number of pages7
ISBN (Print)9780646529189
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010
EventConference of the Australasian Society for Cognitive Science (9th : 2009) - Sydney
Duration: 30 Sep 20092 Oct 2009

Conference

ConferenceConference of the Australasian Society for Cognitive Science (9th : 2009)
CitySydney
Period30/09/092/10/09

Fingerprint

Face recognition
Processing
Cameras
Display devices

Bibliographical note

Copyright 2009 by the Australasian Society for Cognitive Science. Publisher version archived with the permission of the Editor, ASCS09 : Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the Australasian Society for Cognitive Science. This copy is available for individual, non-commercial use. Permission to reprint/republish this version for other uses must be obtained from the publisher.

Keywords

  • face recognition
  • self recognition
  • familiarity
  • motion capture
  • biological motion
  • speech type
  • perceptionaction coupling

Cite this

Bennetts, R., Burke, D., Brooks, K. R., & Robbins, R. A. (2010). The Use of dynamic cues in self and familiar face recognition. In W. Christensen, E. Schier, & J. Sutton (Eds.), ASCS09: proceedings of the 9th Conference of the Australasian Society for Cognitive Science (pp. 21-27). North Ryde, NSW: Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science. https://doi.org/10.5096/ASCS20094
Bennetts, Rachel ; Burke, Darren ; Brooks, Kevin R. ; Robbins, Rachel A. / The Use of dynamic cues in self and familiar face recognition. ASCS09: proceedings of the 9th Conference of the Australasian Society for Cognitive Science. editor / Wayne Christensen ; Elizabeth Schier ; John Sutton. North Ryde, NSW : Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science, 2010. pp. 21-27
@inproceedings{5210a58b385748ab8ac11001bc8d4214,
title = "The Use of dynamic cues in self and familiar face recognition",
abstract = "Familiarity plays an important role in face processing. The importance of familiarity is increased when facial form cues are degraded, so that a person must rely primarily on movement (dynamic) information to identify someone. It is, however, unclear which dynamic cues are used for face recognition of both familiar and unfamiliar faces. Furthermore, little work has been done on dynamic self-face recognition, and none has focused on the type of movement that facilitates this process. The current study used motion capture cameras to record and isolate facial movements in order to test recognition of self, familiar and unfamiliar faces. Participants completed a 2AFC same/different face-matching task involving point-light displays of natural motion (i.e. both rigid and non-rigid motion), rigid motion only (e.g. nodding/shaking), non-rigid motion only (e.g. mouth/eyebrow motion) and still images to determine whether differences in familiarity resulted in the use of different movement cues. The manner (style) in which someone is speaking may also impact on whether they can be easily identified from dynamic cues. Consequently, speech style was either matched or mismatched between video clips. We found that matching performance was more accurate overall when speech style was matched than mismatched. Familiar face matching appears to use rigid, non-rigid and natural movement cues equally, but unfamiliar and self-face matching are more accurate for rigid than natural motion when speech style differs between clips. These results are discussed in relation to previous research on dynamic face recognition, and possible implications for current face processing models.",
keywords = "face recognition, self recognition, familiarity, motion capture, biological motion, speech type, perceptionaction coupling",
author = "Rachel Bennetts and Darren Burke and Brooks, {Kevin R.} and Robbins, {Rachel A.}",
note = "Copyright 2009 by the Australasian Society for Cognitive Science. Publisher version archived with the permission of the Editor, ASCS09 : Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the Australasian Society for Cognitive Science. This copy is available for individual, non-commercial use. Permission to reprint/republish this version for other uses must be obtained from the publisher.",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.5096/ASCS20094",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780646529189",
pages = "21--27",
editor = "Wayne Christensen and Elizabeth Schier and John Sutton",
booktitle = "ASCS09",
publisher = "Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science",

}

Bennetts, R, Burke, D, Brooks, KR & Robbins, RA 2010, The Use of dynamic cues in self and familiar face recognition. in W Christensen, E Schier & J Sutton (eds), ASCS09: proceedings of the 9th Conference of the Australasian Society for Cognitive Science. Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science, North Ryde, NSW, pp. 21-27, Conference of the Australasian Society for Cognitive Science (9th : 2009), Sydney, 30/09/09. https://doi.org/10.5096/ASCS20094

The Use of dynamic cues in self and familiar face recognition. / Bennetts, Rachel; Burke, Darren; Brooks, Kevin R.; Robbins, Rachel A.

ASCS09: proceedings of the 9th Conference of the Australasian Society for Cognitive Science. ed. / Wayne Christensen; Elizabeth Schier; John Sutton. North Ryde, NSW : Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science, 2010. p. 21-27.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceeding contributionResearchpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - The Use of dynamic cues in self and familiar face recognition

AU - Bennetts, Rachel

AU - Burke, Darren

AU - Brooks, Kevin R.

AU - Robbins, Rachel A.

N1 - Copyright 2009 by the Australasian Society for Cognitive Science. Publisher version archived with the permission of the Editor, ASCS09 : Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the Australasian Society for Cognitive Science. This copy is available for individual, non-commercial use. Permission to reprint/republish this version for other uses must be obtained from the publisher.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Familiarity plays an important role in face processing. The importance of familiarity is increased when facial form cues are degraded, so that a person must rely primarily on movement (dynamic) information to identify someone. It is, however, unclear which dynamic cues are used for face recognition of both familiar and unfamiliar faces. Furthermore, little work has been done on dynamic self-face recognition, and none has focused on the type of movement that facilitates this process. The current study used motion capture cameras to record and isolate facial movements in order to test recognition of self, familiar and unfamiliar faces. Participants completed a 2AFC same/different face-matching task involving point-light displays of natural motion (i.e. both rigid and non-rigid motion), rigid motion only (e.g. nodding/shaking), non-rigid motion only (e.g. mouth/eyebrow motion) and still images to determine whether differences in familiarity resulted in the use of different movement cues. The manner (style) in which someone is speaking may also impact on whether they can be easily identified from dynamic cues. Consequently, speech style was either matched or mismatched between video clips. We found that matching performance was more accurate overall when speech style was matched than mismatched. Familiar face matching appears to use rigid, non-rigid and natural movement cues equally, but unfamiliar and self-face matching are more accurate for rigid than natural motion when speech style differs between clips. These results are discussed in relation to previous research on dynamic face recognition, and possible implications for current face processing models.

AB - Familiarity plays an important role in face processing. The importance of familiarity is increased when facial form cues are degraded, so that a person must rely primarily on movement (dynamic) information to identify someone. It is, however, unclear which dynamic cues are used for face recognition of both familiar and unfamiliar faces. Furthermore, little work has been done on dynamic self-face recognition, and none has focused on the type of movement that facilitates this process. The current study used motion capture cameras to record and isolate facial movements in order to test recognition of self, familiar and unfamiliar faces. Participants completed a 2AFC same/different face-matching task involving point-light displays of natural motion (i.e. both rigid and non-rigid motion), rigid motion only (e.g. nodding/shaking), non-rigid motion only (e.g. mouth/eyebrow motion) and still images to determine whether differences in familiarity resulted in the use of different movement cues. The manner (style) in which someone is speaking may also impact on whether they can be easily identified from dynamic cues. Consequently, speech style was either matched or mismatched between video clips. We found that matching performance was more accurate overall when speech style was matched than mismatched. Familiar face matching appears to use rigid, non-rigid and natural movement cues equally, but unfamiliar and self-face matching are more accurate for rigid than natural motion when speech style differs between clips. These results are discussed in relation to previous research on dynamic face recognition, and possible implications for current face processing models.

KW - face recognition

KW - self recognition

KW - familiarity

KW - motion capture

KW - biological motion

KW - speech type

KW - perceptionaction coupling

U2 - 10.5096/ASCS20094

DO - 10.5096/ASCS20094

M3 - Conference proceeding contribution

SN - 9780646529189

SP - 21

EP - 27

BT - ASCS09

A2 - Christensen, Wayne

A2 - Schier, Elizabeth

A2 - Sutton, John

PB - Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science

CY - North Ryde, NSW

ER -

Bennetts R, Burke D, Brooks KR, Robbins RA. The Use of dynamic cues in self and familiar face recognition. In Christensen W, Schier E, Sutton J, editors, ASCS09: proceedings of the 9th Conference of the Australasian Society for Cognitive Science. North Ryde, NSW: Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science. 2010. p. 21-27 https://doi.org/10.5096/ASCS20094