The Value of the consensus and timeliness in markets with few analysts: evaluating analyst forecast accuracy in Australia

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceeding contributionpeer-review

Abstract

This paper compares the relative forecast accuracy of the consensus and the most recent individual analyst earnings forecast using Australian analyst forecast data. It then examines the reasons for differences in the accuracy of these forecast measures in a market with relatively few analysts. The consensus forecast is more accurate than the most recent individual analyst forecast in 19 out of 20 years of the sample period from 1987 to 2006. The differences are significant for 9 out of 20 years. In spite of the low number of analysts following in the local market, it is the number of analysts following which explains the greater accuracy of the consensus forecast. Furthermore, the timeliness of analysts’ forecasts does not contribute to increasing forecast accuracy over a short forecast horizon.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication31st Annual Congress of the European Accounting Association
Place of PublicationRotterdam, Holland
PublisherEuropean Accounting Association
Number of pages38
Publication statusPublished - 2008
EventAnnual Congress of the European Accounting Association (31st : 2008) - Rotterdam, Holland
Duration: 23 Apr 200825 Apr 2008

Conference

ConferenceAnnual Congress of the European Accounting Association (31st : 2008)
CityRotterdam, Holland
Period23/04/0825/04/08

Keywords

  • earnings forecasts
  • financial analysts
  • consensus forecast

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Value of the consensus and timeliness in markets with few analysts: evaluating analyst forecast accuracy in Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this