TY - JOUR
T1 - The water balance of northern Africa during the mid-Holocene
T2 - an evaluation of the 6 Ka BP PMIP simulations
AU - Coe, M.
AU - Harrison, S.
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - Runoff fields over northern Africa (10-25°N, 20°W-30°E) derived from 17 atmospheric general circulation models driven by identical 6 ka BP orbital forcing, sea surface temperatures, and CO2 concentration have been analyzed using a hydrological routing scheme (HYDRA) to simulate changes in lake area. The AGCM-simulated runoff produced six-fold differences in simulated lake area between models, although even the largest simulated changes considerably underestimate the observed changes in lake area during the mid-Holocene. The inter-model differences in simulated lake area are largely due to differences in simulated runoff (the squared correlation coefficient, R2, is 0.84). Most of these differences can be attributed to differences in the simulated precipitation (R2 = 0.83). The higher correlation between runoff and simulated lake area (R2 = 0.92) implies that simulated differences in evaporation have a contributory effect. When runoff is calculated using an offline land-surface scheme (BIOME3), the correlation between runoff and simulated lake area is (R2 = 0.94). Finally, the spatial distribution of simulated precipitation can exert an important control on the overall response.
AB - Runoff fields over northern Africa (10-25°N, 20°W-30°E) derived from 17 atmospheric general circulation models driven by identical 6 ka BP orbital forcing, sea surface temperatures, and CO2 concentration have been analyzed using a hydrological routing scheme (HYDRA) to simulate changes in lake area. The AGCM-simulated runoff produced six-fold differences in simulated lake area between models, although even the largest simulated changes considerably underestimate the observed changes in lake area during the mid-Holocene. The inter-model differences in simulated lake area are largely due to differences in simulated runoff (the squared correlation coefficient, R2, is 0.84). Most of these differences can be attributed to differences in the simulated precipitation (R2 = 0.83). The higher correlation between runoff and simulated lake area (R2 = 0.92) implies that simulated differences in evaporation have a contributory effect. When runoff is calculated using an offline land-surface scheme (BIOME3), the correlation between runoff and simulated lake area is (R2 = 0.94). Finally, the spatial distribution of simulated precipitation can exert an important control on the overall response.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036335841&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00382-001-0219-3
DO - 10.1007/s00382-001-0219-3
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0036335841
VL - 19
SP - 155
EP - 166
JO - Climate Dynamics
JF - Climate Dynamics
SN - 0930-7575
IS - 2
ER -