Thinking, willing and judging

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this paper I examine Max Deutscher’s recent accounts of thinking, willing and judging, derived from his reading of Hannah Arendt’s The Life of the Mind, as set out in his book Judgment After Arendt. Against Deutscher I argue that thinking does not presuppose thoughtfulness, that being willing is compatible with willing reluctantly, and that actor and spectator judgments are distinct types of judgments.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)53-64
Number of pages12
JournalCrossroads : an interdisciplinary journal for the study of history, philosophy, religion and classics
Volume4
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Publisher. Article originally published in Crossroads : an interdisciplinary journal for the study of history, philosophy, religion and classics, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 53-64. The original article can be found at http://www.uq.edu.au/crossroads/archives.html#v4i1. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and Crossroads and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Thinking, willing and judging'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this