Three Lidcombe program clinic visit options: a phase II trial

Sarita Koushik, Sally Hewat*, Mark Onslow, Rosalee Shenker, Mark Jones, Sue O'Brian, Ann Packman, Ross Menzies, Elisabeth Harrison, Linda Wilson

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    5 Citations (Scopus)


    Purpose: Weekly clinic visits are recommended in the Lidcombe Program Treatment Guide (Packman et al., 2015). That specification is based on traditional speech-language pathology practices rather than empirical research, and two studies have suggested that such a format does not always occur in clinical communities. This research was conducted to determine the relative efficacy of different Lidcombe Program models of clinic visits. Method: Thirty-one children were randomized to three different service delivery models: twice-weekly, weekly and fortnightly (once every two weeks) clinic visits. All children were treated with the Lidcombe Program following manualised procedures. Measures of percentage syllables stuttered were obtained from beyond clinic audio recordings pre- and post-randomization. Results: Results showed that the twice-weekly and fortnightly treatment formats were not suitable for all families. However, the fortnightly outcomes at 9 months post-randomization were comparable with those attained during weekly clinic visits. Conclusions: These results justify further, large-scale clinical trialling to compare weekly Lidcombe Program clinic visits with schedules involving less frequent clinic visits.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number105919
    Pages (from-to)1-9
    Number of pages9
    JournalJournal of Communication Disorders
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2019


    • stuttering
    • randomized controlled trial
    • service delivery
    • intervention


    Dive into the research topics of 'Three Lidcombe program clinic visit options: a phase II trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this